thormasterofthesword Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeosWiseman Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 The link is broken. Try it again EDIT: Fixing the slight OCG problemsThis card can only be Special SummonedWarrior-Typemonsters The card is pretty good for your first card. Good job! 9.5/10 :DYou're getting a good luck rep! ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zancrow the flame god Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 awesome! 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaia Overload Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Looks fine to me, but use the Space Bar after periods. Stupid Criticism1) Thor was master of Thunder not swords or flames2) Thor used a hammer not a sword JK 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
έκλειψη Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Not bad. Immune to effects seems like a pretty big advantage in comparison to the only summoning requirement being that the Tributes are Warrior-Type, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeosWiseman Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Looks fine to me' date=' but use the Space Bar after periods. Stupid Criticism1) Thor was master of Thunder not swords or flames2) Thor used a hammer not a sword JK 8/10[/quote'] That's right. I new I forgot something the spaces between the sentences.. *face slap* Maybe this is another Thor :?.... :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Yes! Ignoring all the OCG errors it's actually not a bad utility card for Warriors. We have a ton of those, too. 3000 ATK and untargettable. Almost "eww" worthy, but still pretty good. =O 9/10, Special Summony goodness. x] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Yes! Ignoring all the OCG errors it's actually not a bad utility card for Warriors. We have a ton of those' date=' too. 3000 ATK and untargettable. Almost "eww" worthy, but still pretty good. =O 9/10, Special Summony goodness. x']Going with the effect rather then the OCG. This is why I respect you Skyson ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Yes! Ignoring all the OCG errors it's actually not a bad utility card for Warriors. We have a ton of those' date=' too. 3000 ATK and untargettable. Almost "eww" worthy, but still pretty good. =O 9/10, Special Summony goodness. x']Going with the effect rather then the OCG. This is why I respect you Skyson ^_^ Mhm. Too many "Bad ocg 1/10" rates when the effect of the card is perfectly understandable. Like, "this card never dies" is unreadable OCG, but "your opponent cant destroy this card with effects" is just "bad" OCG. As long as I have a clear idea of what the card does, that's what matters. The only time OCG really matters is when a card is going to be sent to the head of production to be actually made. Oh wait, that never happens. Nobody cares. OCG fixes are appreciated, but they absolutely shouldn't affect the rating of a card. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfman505 Posted June 9, 2010 Report Share Posted June 9, 2010 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.