-Griffin Posted June 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 19, 2010 Why would you play a worse card when there are better options?You wouldn't' date=' but that doesn't mean it's bad. Is Book of Moon as good as Call of the Haunted? No, but it doesn't make BoM bad. And yes, this isn't the best example, but it's an example regardless.[/quote'] Better (perhaps the best) example: Sakuretsu Armor versus Dimensional Prison. Eater's attribute works better in some places, it can hit for more damage if that would matter, it can block attacks, which might keep you alive for a turn longer, and has several other ways in which it can be slightly better. It's more a case of E-Con vs Book to me. Book wins 90% of the time, but E-Con has its uses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 I have one more argument: Level Eater looks awesomer than Treeborn Frog. EDIT: Wait' date=' controlling Quickdraw isn't "controlling the board" (well, it is, since you're about to...you know what I mean). It's...having a monster in your hand.[/quote'] I said COMMIT. When you play QD, you COMMIT to the board by playing monster cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.