KRIMSON Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 as with my other cards,you can comment whatever u feel like,this time the text got kinda small so i put the card description below the image This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 3 Spellcaster-Type monsters with different names on your side of the field.Increase the ATK of this card by 500 for every Spellcaster-Type monster that is removed from play.You can pay half your Life Points to destroy all monsters your opponent controls.This card cannot declare an attack the turn you activate this effect.Return this card to your Extra Deck during the End Phase of the turn in which it was Special Summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sliver King Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 The formatting is wrong for this sort of summon. 1 Spellcaster-Type monster + 1 Spellcaster-Type monster + 1 Spellcaster-Type monster This card can only be Special Summoned Removing from play the above Fusion Material Monsters you control. Monsters with the same name cannot be used. Increase the ATK of this card by 500 for every Spellcaster-Type monster removed from play. You can pay half your Life Points to destroy all monsters your opponent controls. This card cannot declare an attack the turn this effect is activated. Return this card to your Extra Deck during the End Phase of the turn in which it was Special Summoned. This card seems a slight bit OP'd. And the picture is from Magic: The Gathering. I wish people would use properly cropped original pictures. The effect is cool though. Also, try to remove at least one star. A card needs to be extremely epic to have 12 stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 What's with the -nospaces-?What's with the Type not being capitalized?There's no such things as "ULTIMATE EDITION".This is your 127th card in your set?Why is it a fusion? Do you have to use polmeryzation?When you activate the (1st or 2nd) effect, you can't attack?This card is UP. You'd want to activate the effect of this card because the ATK sucks.But when you activate it, you can't attack. Then you have to return this cardto your Extra Deck. UP'ed. Image isn't that good.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zextra Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 It doesn't list Fusion material Monsters, and the pic is taken from a Magic The Gathering Card. It's actually quite UP'ed. Still, not bad - some OCG errors but pretty good for your first card. (Fusion)7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-Hundred And One Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Ooh. It seems really cool, but in practice, it's just killing 3 Spellcasters and half your LP for a monster on your side of the field to attack directly. It's... a bit Underpowered. Really good OCG, though. The only thing that really bothers me is that you don't put spaces after your periods. :PExcellent job for a new mem, 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Why is it a fusion? Do you have to use polmeryzation?When you activate the (1st or 2nd) effect' date=' you can't attack?This card is UP. You'd want to activate the effect of this card because the ATK sucks.But when you activate it, you can't attack. Then you have to return this cardto your Extra Deck. UP'ed. Image isn't that good.[/quote'] We seriously need to get Tronta back to this section. SRSLY GUYSE. Why do you think that having this card not attack IS SO UNFAIRE? Why do you think that the no attack restriction on this card is bad? Why do you think the returning of this card is bad? Why, oh why are you so horrible at this game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeXodus Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Why is it a fusion? Do you have to use polmeryzation?When you activate the (1st or 2nd) effect' date=' you can't attack?This card is UP. You'd want to activate the effect of this card because the ATK sucks.But when you activate it, you can't attack. Then you have to return this cardto your Extra Deck. UP'ed. Image isn't that good.[/quote'] We seriously need to get Tronta back to this section. SRSLY GUYSE. Why do you think that having this card not attack IS SO UNFAIRE? Why do you think that the no attack restriction on this card is bad? Why do you think the returning of this card is bad? Why, oh why are you so horrible at this game? Wait, so what your saying is that this card is balanced? Or OP? Or UP? You really aren't making much sense, of course returning the card is bad when you can't attack if you use the effect because the ATK of this card is only 1500. So when you use the effect, you can gain the extra 500+ for every Spellcaster removed. So if you have some Spellcasters removed, you'll obviously want to activate the effect, so when you activate the effect, this card can't attack, then at the end phase, he is returned. It's unusable IF you use the effect, other than that, you can attack with the 1500 ATK or put it in DEF and have it sit there with 3500 DEF. What are you possibly trying to do? Troll me? And does it matter if I don't play the game? I'm not 100% sure about everything, I'll make mistakes, but it doesn't mean you have to b**ch about it. Everyone will make misconceptions, but atleast we tried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sliver King Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 inb4flamefest. Did you not read how this card is summoned? This card has an instant 3000 ATK. Summon him again (Which is rather easy) He becomes a 4500. Plus, most decks run at least 1 removal card. Thus this card has crazy ATK. And all of you are RAEGing over it's 1500 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.