Death12328 Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 *Hides in a nearby trench from the B.C.-Bombs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 'either play controls' can be excluded. Its ok, not too impressive though, it basically sits on your field, thats it, just sits there, unless you wanna tribute it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 yeah basically what DJ-Osiris said...thats 'bout it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Not really great, but it's good. It does seem very weak however.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 woah! DOUBLED! geez... with 0 ATK... that things not worth runningplus since it cant grow ATK, its a bit useless... remember... Raviel attacking this thing is an instead OTK... its onyl good for creature swap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 lol. A picture from some treefolk card in Morningtide? (MTG) Well, since you can't double 0.... 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death12328 Posted January 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Out of all who know this cards effect, YM7, not his own damage, its your opponents damage, so yeah, a mere Ancient Gear Golem without any equipment or boost can do what Limiter Removal can give without destruction at the end of the turn happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 As i have said be4, you take this piece of cardboard / pixels game far to seriously lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 As i have said be4fore' date=' you take this piece of card[s']board[/s]stock / pixels game far to seriously lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 what on earth is cardstock, and be4 is part of my online writing language so it doesnt need to be corrected, tis my style ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 what on earth is cardstock' date=' and be4 is part of my online writing language so it doesnt need to be corrected, tis my style ^_^[/quote'] cardstock is like paper, but not as flimsy. cardboard is too thick to be a yugioh card. am i the only person who knows that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Ah well everyone says cardboard, makes it sounds more cheap and crappy that way ^_^ muwahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 ok. ANYWAYS, if this card cant have atk increases, and 0 atk and def. It's basically a zone filler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 YM7 i think that was obvious lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 YM7 i think that was obvious lol xD starts with 10. (10)no atk increases -1 (9)no atk or def -2 (7)Effect does help +2 (9)8 Star? -1 (8 ) 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Eh, it's ok. I like the picture. Pity with the effect, really. 6.5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Kwl i like it its not the best card you have made though and im sure you all agree with me, but never-the-less i rate it 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted January 10, 2008 Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Good pic, underpowered. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.