Guest fLare2 Posted August 2, 2010 Report Share Posted August 2, 2010 First fiend card ever made (improved version) , please rate it and give me feedback; as usual i know there are quite a lot of OCG errors. Uploaded with ImageShack.us This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except when the combined ATK of all removed from play LIGHT monster is 4000 or higher. When this card is Special Summoned Successfully, return all removed from play LIGHT monsters to the owners' Graveyard(s), increase this monsters ATK by 200 for each LIGHT monster returned this way. When there are more then 5 LIGHT monsters removed from play, once per turn, you can negate the activation of a Spell or Trap and destroy it. Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosmos7500 Posted August 2, 2010 Report Share Posted August 2, 2010 Shouldn't you try to short the OCG a little like: "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 3 Dark Atribute monsters with the ATK sum of 4000 or more." 7.5/10, BUT a good first Field-Type card. The picture is good, just like the Name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 2, 2010 Report Share Posted August 2, 2010 It isn't overpowered from the attack increase, more so from it being an easy to summon +2750 ATK beatstick. IMO lower the ATK attack and boost some and it would be a lot better. For wording make it "combined ATK of all removed from play Light monster is 4000 or higher", "If more then 5 removed from play cards is more then 5, you can negate the activation of 1 Spell or Trap and destroy it". IMO it makes it sound better. Good job for a first card. Shouldn't you try to short the OCG a little like: "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 3 Dark Atribute monsters with the ATK sum of 4000 or more." 7.5/10, BUT a good first Field-Type card. The picture is good, just like the NameWhy did you go from removed from play light monsters to discarding dark? I get dark fitting more, but not the discard part. That would totally kill it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted August 2, 2010 Report Share Posted August 2, 2010 Pic is kinda blurred by the Holo.OCG fix: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except when the combined ATK of all removed from play LIGHT monster is 4000 or higher. When this card is Special Summoned Successfully, return all removed from play LIGHT monsters to the owners' Graveyard(s), increase this monsters ATK by 200 for each LIGHT monster returned this way. When there are more then 5 LIGHT monsters removed from play, once per turn, you can negate the activation of a Spell or Trap and destroy it. I also ballanced it out some more, becouse it would otherwise be to OPed. As Flame Dragon said, I would lower its ATK to 2500-2400ish. A 8.6/10, nice 1st card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fLare2 Posted August 2, 2010 Report Share Posted August 2, 2010 Pic is kinda blurred by the Holo.OCG fix: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except when the combined ATK of all removed from play LIGHT monster is 4000 or higher. When this card is Special Summoned Successfully, return all removed from play LIGHT monsters to the owners' Graveyard(s), increase this monsters ATK by 200 for each LIGHT monster returned this way. When there are more then 5 LIGHT monsters removed from play, once per turn, you can negate the activation of a Spell or Trap and destroy it. I also ballanced it out some more, becouse it would otherwise be to OPed. As Flame Dragon said, I would lower its ATK to 2500-2400ish. A 8.6/10, nice 1st card.Ty for correction. Shouldn't you try to short the OCG a little like: "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 3 Dark Atribute monsters with the ATK sum of 4000 or more." 7.5/10, BUT a good first Field-Type card. The picture is good, just like the NameI know, I also thought this way but it woudnt make a differance to the text shown on the card it will still be minimized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.