Welche the crab Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 Remove the neg rep feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 No. negs teach people a lesson. and some people collect negs. No Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 No. negs teach people a lesson. and some people collect negs. No Support Negs are for mini-modding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 No, it's not. >_>Mini-modding is when you think you have power over someone that is breaking the rules, and posting something like "Wow, n00b, this post is against the rules. I'm gonna' report you." instead of just reporting it and moving along.But, no Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMRenji Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 No support. As said above, some people collect Negs. Negs are also usually used to tell someone that they are breaking the rules. There are already no Neutrals on the new system, if we get rid of Negs, we will only have Reps. The point is, YCM need Negs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 No, it's not. >_>Mini-modding is when you think you have power over someone that is breaking the rules, and posting something like "Wow, n00b, this post is against the rules. I'm gonna' report you." instead of just reporting it and moving along.But, no Support. Mini-modding is when you try to deal with something on your own instead of asking the mods. Mostly thats what negs do. Spamming? That is for the mods. God-modding, still for the mods. Name one use of negs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 Removing negs means removing the rep system altogether. Solely positive reps are pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 Collecting them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 Removing negs means removing the rep system altogether. Solely positive reps are pointless. No, a good member gets reps. Bad members don't get them. And also, just out of interest, do you know why reps were made in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted August 5, 2010 Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 I say no to getting rid of them. But if we could somehow get the message that came with them, people could better understand why they got negs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted August 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 I say no to getting rid of them. But if we could somehow get the message that came with them, people could better understand why they got negs. That is doable, but why not just rid ourselves of the pointless thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Resistance- Posted August 9, 2010 Report Share Posted August 9, 2010 This thread is pointless.No one's gonna support cuz people need to learn the ways of the negative rep system.Some people collect negs.If theres no neg reps,[spoiler='[spoiler=Look at this!!] everyone will have Positive reps!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.