John A. Zoidberg Posted August 14, 2010 Report Share Posted August 14, 2010 Got this idea, wanted to see how it went.Enjoy! [spoiler=Fiendish Hydra][spoiler=Lore]This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 3 Dragon-type monsters from your field. If this card destroys a monster on your opponents field, it can attack again. This card loses 100 ATK for every extra time it attacks in a turn. OCG fixes and suggestions would be appreciated :D (Image Credit goes to Jazin Kay) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 14, 2010 Report Share Posted August 14, 2010 Way to hard to summon for its effect. 5 Dragons is a HELL of a lot. Reduce it to 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2010 I just made it 5 'cos of the picture.Yeah, 3 sounds good. fix'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted August 15, 2010 Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 3 Dragon-Type monsters you control. If this card destroys a monster on your opponent controls, it can attack again. This card loses 100 ATK for every extra time it attacks in a turn. Last effect is iffy on the OCG, so im not sure if it's right or wrong. It might be OP'd due to the fact it can attack directly after it attacks, say, 4 monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 Yes, but if it does, it loses 400 ATK. Maybe should make it so it can't attack directly?And as far as the OCG, you got 1 thing wrong:You made it "If this card destroys a monster on your opponents controls..."I take it you meant to say "If this card destroys a monster you opponent controls..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted August 15, 2010 Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 Yes, but if it does, it loses 400 ATK. Maybe should make it so it can't attack directly?And as far as the OCG, you got 1 thing wrong:You made it "If this card destroys a monster on your opponents controls..."I take it you meant to say "If this card destroys a monster your opponent controls..." Typo fail for me. Sorry about that. But yeah, id wouldnt add the drawback that it cant attack directly, i'd put a drawback on the attacks or something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 Okay, I'll post when edited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John A. Zoidberg Posted August 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.