Insert_Name_Here Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Red-Eyes_Darkness_Metal_Dragon Discuss also, how many bad cards does the Red-Eyes archtype have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 This card is SO epic. around 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 This card made Dragons a way more playable! It's pretty easy to get out, lolbeastsick, Dark, good effect and pimp. A thing i hate is the fact they made him level 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='The Little Dragon' timestamp='1283104739' post='4578674'] This card made Dragons a way more playable!It's pretty easy to get out, lolbeastsick, Dark, good effect and pimp. A thing i hate is the fact they made him level 10 [/quote] it would be stupid good if it were a level 8. i'm personally fine with its current level though. Red-Eyes is barley an archtype. The only good cards are this and wyvern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 Oh, the thing should be sooooooo forbidden.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 ^No. Should stay @3. It is balanced enough really. If it wasn't balanced, Hopeless Dragons would be meta, and they aren't. Still, it brought Dragons back to their former glory, and I like that. (lolibeathopelessdragonsatlocalsintop16). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 It really is the only card that keeps dragons relevant. Dragon might be one of the most undersupported types tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 How is it Balanced? By removing 1 Dragon-Type from the Graveyard? Sure. Why not solve that with Future Fusion, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='thoch' timestamp='1283115242' post='4579340'] It really is the only card that keeps dragons relevant. Dragon might be one of the most undersupported types tbh. [/quote] Dragons are one of the most supported and most impacting types in the game. lrn2yugimonz. They have a lot of nice support. Burst Breath FTW!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 Darkness Metal is just a badass card in general. [quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1283115303' post='4579344'] How is it Balanced? By removing 1 Dragon-Type from the Graveyard? Sure. Why not solve that with Future Fusion, eh? [/quote] Except Future Fusion is more ridiculous then Darkness Metal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1283115303' post='4579344'] How is it Balanced? By removing 1 Dragon-Type from the Graveyard? Sure. Why not solve that with Future Fusion, eh? [/quote] ...flawed logic again? Understand how Future Fusion is played, then repost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='}~Gob~Zom~{' timestamp='1283116200' post='4579409'] Dragons are one of the most supported and most impacting types in the game. lrn2yugimonz. They have a lot of nice support. Burst Breath FTW!!!! [/quote] the game is more impacted by archetypes than pure types right now. And those archetypes are only good because of ridiculous support. Dragons are ok, but not amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='}~Gob~Zom~{' timestamp='1283114252' post='4579286'] ^No. Should stay @3. It is balanced enough really. If it wasn't balanced, Hopeless Dragons would be meta, and they aren't. Still, it brought Dragons back to their former glory, and I like that. (lolibeathopelessdragonsatlocalsintop16). [/quote] [img]http://myspace.roflposters.com/images/rofl/myspace/1225082353177.jpg.%5Broflposters.com%5D.myspace.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Luxord' timestamp='1283121750' post='4579781'] [img]http://myspace.roflposters.com/images/rofl/myspace/1225082353177.jpg.%5Broflposters.com%5D.myspace.jpg[/img] [/quote] myspace roflposters? really? And by the way, "you are wrong, leonidas." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Darkest Hour' timestamp='1283119147' post='4579612'] ...flawed logic again? Understand how Future Fusion is played, then repost. [/quote] I[i] know[/i] how it works. 1.Use it to Summon... say, an F.G.D.? Send a Blue-Eyes and some random 4 Dragons. 2. Remove one of them, Special Summon REDMD. 3. Revive that Blue-Eyes. Result: Two beatsticks, one more coming. A Summoner, with a limit of once per turn. Would you like to be playing against [i]that[/i]? I'm sorry if this reply sounded rude or anything, I just want to prove my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 An extremely powerful and good card for Dragons. Considering their beatstick nature, this card is somewhat OPed, and its "Dragon RFG" to summon is both a blessing and a curse. For one, throwing out a 2800 SS engine for big monsters with almost no effort is incredible, but RFGing the Dragon means you probably won't be using that Dragon again, which is difficult in early game circumstances if you didn't draw Future Fusion. It can be really easy to swarm the field if you have 2 in your hand early, as well as one or two other dragons to use as fodder. Play a dragon, RFG it for one, revive/SS a Dragon, RFG that for the secnd, revive/SS another Dragon. This helps Dragons keep up with the game. Pretty nice to resurrect Dragon Synchros with, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Darkest Hour' timestamp='1283121836' post='4579785'] myspace roflposters? really? And by the way, "you are wrong, leonidas." [/quote] You try finding a good image macro of "You, sir, are an idiot." And by the way, "You, sir, are an idiot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1283114114' post='4579282'] Oh, the thing should be sooooooo forbidden.... [/quote] Trolololol. Anyhow, good dragon support is good. But only rich people becoming better at this game is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen-Dragoon Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 @=The End Gamer= - Your Vanilla Puns are full of win! + Rep. OT: I think this has basically been answered already. If Darkness Metal Dragon wasn't around then dragons as a type would hardly see the light of day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 [quote name='Luxord' timestamp='1283122663' post='4579830'] You try finding a good image macro of "You, sir, are an idiot." And by the way, "You, sir, are an idiot." [/quote] Just make one. If you want me to be, then sure? I guess so....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Should be limited. Swarming with high level dragons are fun but kinda OPed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 People make way too big of a deal about this card. He's not nearly enough to propel a dedicated deck to anything near a competitive level. Yes, in a truly balanced format, he would be pushing it, but even then, not ridiculously so. What balances him out? Well, the fact that hopeless dragon actually has to [i]run[/i] all those incredibly useless level 8 dragon beatsticks to function. Because guess what, on occasion they get drawn. It makes for a horribly unstable and inconsistent deck by its very design. The best dragon deck I've seen surfaced a few formats ago and used this guy with Koaki Meiru Drago. And it was only an anti-meta deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 I instst that Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon + Future Fusion = Doom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scyire Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Dragons would be hit VERY hard if this was banned. Although broken, deserves to stay alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 [quote name='BlindMonkey' timestamp='1283131460' post='4580499'] I instst that Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon + Future Fusion = Doom. [/quote] Just because one of your friends is a billionare, he has a million broken dragons, and you can't win against him, doesn't mean you can change the ban list. I've won against many hopeless dragons with my Dark Gigavise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.