DARKPLANT RISING Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20091017202946/yugioh/images/thumb/a/a4/XX-SaberFaultrollANPR-EN-SR-1E.jpg/400px-XX-SaberFaultrollANPR-EN-SR-1E.jpg[/img] Discuss on [s]loltrolls[/s] Faultrolls, and if you like, the whole lolzy X-Saber Archetype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 XXX-Gaysaber SuccessFaultroll. This thing needs to die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Should have been hit by the banlist, at least their non-archetype helper, lolcat, was band. Yes, that typo was on purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 This card stupidly promotes overextensions. That's not good for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrathos Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Failtroll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Should be at one to balance the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Yesterday I used Professional Duelist's Saber deck just to try one out I OTK'd with 0 experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Kill it with fire i say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Should be @1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 [quote name='Άř¢ħėłäűŝ' timestamp='1283519281' post='4594852'] Should be @1. [/quote] [IMG]http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c78/wolfberserker/1281469203516.jpg[/IMG] i totally agree old chap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 Should be at 0. Easy to summon +1 that sets up retarded plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 I liked how when people saw this @0 on the fake banlists nobody complained. This is one of the main reasons X-Sabers are where they are... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1283529815' post='4595178'] I liked how when people saw this @0 on the fake banlists nobody complained. [/quote] Really? Gee. I wonder why? All we need now is someone to rant on how Faultroll deserves to be at 3 and that Sabers are completely not broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 [quote name='Judgment Phoenix' timestamp='1283492136' post='4594508'] XXX-Gaysaber SuccessFaultroll. This thing needs to die. [/quote] THANK YOU FOR USING MY NICKNAME! :D I thought it had gone out of use. Yeah, successfaultroll is successfulfaul. Needs to be banned for Sabers to be balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XX Saber- Dosequis Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 there was a point in the game when BW had 3 BWW not to mention Gale and GB had 3 bestiaris. konami wouldnt even out x sabers so soon after becoming numbuh wan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black W Mage Posted September 3, 2010 Report Share Posted September 3, 2010 name says it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.