DL Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 Remo...you're crazy if you think we'll manage almost 200 people NOW I propose For round 1, the 3v3 I say we have 90 people And randomize the teams 90 / 3 = 30 Then the next round, 2v2 30 / 2 = 15 So 15 teams will be left And this round, we let the people choose their partner then 3rd round onwards, we go 1v1 It'll go, by people 30 15 8 (1 lucky person will get to skip this round) 4 2 1 Or for more organization we can do 48 48 / 3 = 16 16 / 2 = 8 16 8 4 2 1 But 48 seems like too little Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desu the Blue Nerd Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [color=#0000cd]Can't we just get a damn idea and stick to it? :[/color][color=#0000cd]/[/color] [color=#0000cd]P.S. Wouldn't 96 also technically work for your idea and still nobody skips? Hell, it seems like a lot but it's not a huge difference from 90.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 OK So far I'm seeing ideas...but we aren't exactly agreeing on 1 specific idea to use. I'm guessing we should make a poll here and find out which one would do well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desu the Blue Nerd Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [color=#0000cd]You could also just give your own opinion. :/[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 I don't care one way or the other. We already established my thoughts. Team battles, we're hosting, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 And this is why you have no personality, Sonic ANYWAY 96 / 3 = 32 32 / 2 = 16 32 16 8 4 2 1 I'm all for 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☖☠☗JAXCOB☗☠☖ Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 I have no say in this but, Imma have to side with DL on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [quote name='Darklink401' timestamp='1322075116' post='5661420'] And this is why you have no personality, Sonic [/quote] That's what your mother said about you... LAST NIGHT!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 I think there is a problem with DL's math. 96 people will make 32 teams of 3. Half of those teams will go away, making 16 teams of 3. That means 48 people, which makes 24 teams of 2. That will lead to 12 individual people. Then to 6, then to 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusion X. Denver Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1322075999' post='5661442'] I think there is a problem with DL's math. 96 people will make 32 teams of 3. Half of those teams will go away, making 16 teams of 3. That means 48 people, which makes 24 teams of 2. That will lead to 12 individual people. Then to 6, then to 3. [/quote] Which works even better, the final match can decide all 3 places rather than an extra match just for 3rd place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 OK...actually that sounds good, Fuse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 Yup, dat's even better :'D So everyone agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desu the Blue Nerd Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [color=#0000cd]Wait, what? Somebody run over what you guys are thinking. It changes too much.[/color] [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1322075999' post='5661442'] I think there is a problem with DL's math. 96 people will make 32 teams of 3. Half of those teams will go away, making 16 teams of 3. That means 48 people, which makes 24 teams of 2. That will lead to 12 individual people. Then to 6, then to 3. [/quote] [color=#0000cd]No wait. I get it now. And why are you here?[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 He was here to plot out the flaw which was actually a benefit But now he's go- ...he's stoopid D< The second round is teams of two. So it'll end 1v1 So we gotta hold another match for third, sadly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 I agree with it... And Striker, I told you that if you post here you have to join. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desu the Blue Nerd Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [quote name='Darklink401' timestamp='1322084372' post='5661674'] He was here to plot out the flaw which was actually a benefit [color=#0000cd]I skimmed slightly through it but the general idea seemed fine. what he said just seemed like a repeat to be honest. :/[/color] But now he's go- ...he's stoopid D< [color=#0000cd]Yeah.[/color] The second round is teams of two. [color=#0000cd]I thought you said that already. :/[/color] So it'll end 1v1 [color=#0000cd]Again, I thought you said that already.[/color] So we gotta hold another match for third, sadly. [color=#0000cd]Doesn't the person who lost to the winner typicaly take third place?[/color] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 I said that but most of you missed Striker took the 2nd round as also being teams of 3 .-. And Not necessarily, most have a match between the two who lost to the finalists to determine 3rd place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desu the Blue Nerd Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 [color=#0000cd]Most YMBs but usually in tourneys it goes to who lost to the the all time winner. Just saying.[/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 OK, heads up you guys. I'm going to be gone from tomorrow until Sunday. I'll be on and off from my cell, but I won't do anything massive like I normally do. Because of that, I'll post the YMB4 thread in the polls Monday. DL, I need you to copy & paste the ideas we decided on in a PM and send it to me. That way I can post the thread and not search through here like a lost dog XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fusion X. Denver Posted November 23, 2011 Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 Um... I know Vongola's hosting YMB, but don't you think DL should get to host the thread since he planned most of it out? I think that would be the fair thin to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2011 Yeah, you have a point there, Fuse. DL...this means on Monday, you shall post the YMB4 thread ^-^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 24, 2011 Report Share Posted November 24, 2011 Uh....sure Why not, I guess? But I'm assigning jobs Who wants to be the randomizer for teams/matches? And who wants to help close matches? Fuse, IDK if you'll wanna help or not in closing matches, your choice, but you did it in past YMBs, even when you didn't host...so yeah o: Also, I might just post it Saturday or Sunday, because Monday I have exams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2011 Alright I suggest Sunday. I'll be back then, so I'll be able to help out a lot more. Anyway, other than closing matches and randomizer(cause I know I'd probably screw that up)...what else is there to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 24, 2011 Report Share Posted November 24, 2011 ....you can't close matches? Seriously? Well it'd be ideal if Desu randomized (he strikes me as a hard-working person) and you helped me and Fuse close the matches Or you and Fuse close the matches Sure that seems like it leaves me with nothing to do, but I believe I'll have plenty to do thread-editing wise and planning-wise If the workload I get is too little, then I'll randomize the matches for round 2 and onward, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Chaos Sonic Posted November 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2011 Never said I couldn't close the matches. I was talking about the randomizer part XD Well, me and Fuse can alternate on closing matches ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.