Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 I haven't made a Synchro monster in awhile, so I figured I give it a go again. This time I tried making a versatile card that uses Equip Cards to activate it's effects. It's probably Op'ed, but I don't know. Image Credit goes to Jazin Kay. Comment|Rate|Rep|Whatever [img]http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/7119/252705.jpg[/img] Card Lore 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters When this card is Synchro Summoned, you can add 1 Equip Spell Card from your Deck to your hand. During the start of your Battle Phase, if this card is equipped with an Equip Spell Card, you can negate the effects of 1 of the equipped Equip Spell Cards to have this card gain 1 of the following effects, until the End Phase of this turn. • Your opponent cannot activate any Set Spell or Trap cards until the end of Damage Step. • Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card in battle. • When this card destroys a monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard, draw 1 card and remove from play 1 card in your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The True Ace Attorney Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Doesn't seem OP'd to me, in fact it looks quite good. You just might want to change that second sentence to "During the start of your Battle Phase, if this card is equipped with an Equip Spell Card, you can negate the effects of 1 of the equipped Equip Spell Cards to have this card gain 1 of the following effects, until the End Phase:" otherwise, it doesn't specify what's negated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 [quote name='GreatPriestCthulhu' timestamp='1285386248' post='4652376'] Doesn't seem OP'd to me, in fact it looks quite good. You just might want to change that second sentence to "During the start of your Battle Phase, if this card is equipped with an Equip Spell Card, you can negate the effects of 1 of the equipped Equip Spell Cards to have this card gain 1 of the following effects, until the End Phase:" otherwise, it doesn't specify what's negated. [/quote] I made the change like you suggested. Thanks for commenting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Hm, a well decent card. It's not so bad with equip warrior deck. I'd use it if it's real. 9.10 -Dreamz- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 [quote name='Phantasy Dreamz' timestamp='1285387306' post='4652406'] Hm, a well decent card. It's not so bad with equip warrior deck. I'd use it if it's real. 9.10 -Dreamz- [/quote] Thanks for the comment. I feel honored that you would use my card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 "You cannot activate the Equip Spell Card this turn." Erase this^ and put a cost (Better for a Synchro.) "During the start of your Battle Phase..." change this^ for: "During your Main Phase 1..." "Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card in battle." I would like to see this^ while equipped with a Equip Spell Card instead of the original effect. Other than that, could see use but I feel that Gilford the Legend > This maybe add an effect to recover Equips instead of just search them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 [quote name='wero-vasto' timestamp='1285390490' post='4652481'] "You cannot activate the Equip Spell Card this turn." Erase this^ and put a cost (Better for a Synchro.) [b]Will do. As for the cost, I don't think it's needed. You only get 1 Equip Card from Synchro Summoning it anyways. [/b] "During the start of your Battle Phase..." change this^ for: "During your Main Phase 1..." [b]Any particular reason why? I don't think it's incorrect, unless someone else wants to point out otherwise. [/b] "Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card in battle." I would like to see this^ while equipped with a Equip Spell Card instead of the original effect. [b]I'm guessing you mean you would like to see this effect being used along with the addition of the Equip Card's effect? If so, then you could just have another Equip Card equipped to this card, since it only negates 1 Equip Card equipped to it. [/b] Other than that, could see use but I feel that Gilford the Legend > This [b]I don't see how you can compare Gilford with my card. My cards effect is completely different then Gilford the Legend's. He recovers and equips Equip Cards to all of your Warriors, while mine gains effects while negating the effects of 1 Equip Card equipped to it . [/b] maybe add an effect to recover Equips instead of just search them? [b]The whole purpose of this card is to it's effects while it has an Equip Card attached to it. I just added the one time only Deck Search so you could have an Equip Card ready to use this card's effect.[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 [quote]"You cannot activate the Equip Spell Card this turn." Erase this^ and put a cost (Better for a Synchro.) [b]Will do. As for the cost, I don't think it's needed. You only get 1 Equip Card from Synchro Summoning it anyways.[/b] [i]Maybe yes, still there's Mage Power, UwS, and being generic you can run it in a Morphtronic/Power Tool Dragon/Equip Deck.[/i] "During the start of your Battle Phase..." change this^ for: "During your Main Phase 1..." [b]Any particular reason why? I don't think it's incorrect, unless someone else wants to point out otherwise.[/b] [i]Forget it, I re read the first effect and it says "Damage Step".[/i] "Negate the effects of Effect Monsters destroyed by this card in battle." I would like to see this^ while equipped with a Equip Spell Card instead of the original effect. [b]I'm guessing you mean you would like to see this effect being used along with the addition of the Equip Card's effect? If so, then you could just have another Equip Card equipped to this card, since it only negates 1 Equip Card equipped to it.[/b] [i]It would be better as "while equipped", could work more.[/i] Other than that, could see use but I feel that Gilford the Legend > This [b]I don't see how you can compare Gilford with my card. My cards effect is completely different then Gilford the Legend's. He recovers and equips Equip Cards to all of your Warriors, while mine gains effects while negating the effects of 1 Equip Card equipped to it .[/b] [i]Equip Spell Cards lack of recover, and just fat the Deck, Gilford is better cuz it recovers, the only problem of Gilford is that they need to be activated inmediately. Yours need the Equip Spell Cards to work.[/i] maybe add an effect to recover Equips instead of just search them? [b]The whole purpose of this card is to it's effects while it has an Equip Card attached to it. I just added the one time only Deck Search so you could have an Equip Card ready to use this card's effect[/b] [i]I see your point, but again, Equip Spell Cards lack of recover.[/i][/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 That's true, but again, you only get 1 Equip Card, and only 1. If I gave it the ability to search out Equips every one of the controller's turn, then you could just eventually grab 3 United We Stand and Mage Powers etc. Then this card would be rather unfair if the opponent lacks any Spell/Trap removal, since you would need to only negate [b]1 [/b]Equip Card equipped to it. How would the card work better if I were to put "while equipped"? Am I missing something here? I know that Equips lack recovery, however the main point of this card was to use it's effects while it has an Equip Card equipped to it. If I wanted to make a Equip searcher/recovery card, then I would have done it by now, but since you mentioned the problem with Equip Cards, I'll probably make a Graveyard recovery card for Equips. I do appreciate that you been trying to help, but again, this card's not a priority Deck searcher nor a Graveyard recovery card. It's a card that uses it's own effects while negating an Equip Card equipped to it in order to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Yeah... that's no the point of your card, but I'm talking if it was real, that's why I'm repeat of the lack of recover and if you make the effect while equipped then you've got an extra effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 I see. And I'll consider adding that in my card, but right now, I'm too tired to do much of anything. Anyways thanks for taking the time to comment on my card. I appreciate it. Also before I forget to do so, I'll give you a +Rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Duferier Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 lol, pendragon reminds me of king arthur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 [quote name='Shiny Azelf Fan 333' timestamp='1285417424' post='4652788'] lol, pendragon reminds me of king arthur. [/quote] ...Ok? Is there anything you want to say about the card itself? Anything constructive and helpful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 Bump anymore comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archwing Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 My comment is gonna seems short in comparison~ Name Great, Ive allways loved the word pendragon~ Pic: i actually have one just like it in my archive of stuff, but that just means its more awesome Effect: Very good Balanced OCG looks good Overall id say 9.5/10 Even if its a drity synchro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 I would ditch the last effect completely, great pic, by battle. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 [quote name='Archwing' timestamp='1285477061' post='4655998'] My comment is gonna seems short in comparison~ Name Great, Ive allways loved the word pendragon~ Pic: i actually have one just like it in my archive of stuff, but that just means its more awesome Effect: Very good Balanced OCG looks good Overall id say 9.5/10 Even if its a drity synchro [/quote] lol thanks for the comment/rate Archwing I appreciate it. I don't mind most Synchro monsters, except cards like Stardust and Black Rose...>_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRPXD Posted September 29, 2010 Report Share Posted September 29, 2010 Sorry 4 the lateness ladtop broke and is forced to use the slow PS3. Anyway time 2 rate: "Armed Knight Pendragon" Name: 1.9/2 I c ur getting better with names, the name matches the picture, it's sounds scary yet sophisticated. Good Job! Pic: 1.8/2 Looks familiar anyway it's great clean no blurryness somewhat matches it's name. Effect: 1.8/2 Pretty Inovative cancelling an Equip Card's Effect and u get to select what effect it gets, Idk something is still missing I think you could hav made the card more complicated. OCG: 2/2 understood the effect perfectly Balance: 1.8/2 Somewhat balanced the selected effects aren't that powerful. Overall: 9.3/10 Great Synchro Monster that utilizes Spell Equip Cards. Review a card using a PS3 is very difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon™ Posted September 29, 2010 Report Share Posted September 29, 2010 Pendragon. Not a word I hear often. I really have no in-depth commentary to supply due to the several comments before me, so, I'm going to state that if this was real it'd be one of those secret rare holo cards you find in 7 or 13-card packs that you really love. I'd definately use it. Creative, although the card image is in redundantly bad quality. The only thing I see that might eventually turn too repetitive is the RFP-and-Draw destruction effect. I'd rather like it to have a limit of 5 or 6 times (to Draw), either that or a temporary card RFP or back to hand effect. Anyway, nice card- keep makin 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2010 [quote name='LRPXD' timestamp='1285724866' post='4665581'] Sorry 4 the lateness ladtop broke and is forced to use the slow PS3. Anyway time 2 rate: "Armed Knight Pendragon" Name: 1.9/2 I c ur getting better with names, the name matches the picture, it's sounds scary yet sophisticated. Good Job! Pic: 1.8/2 Looks familiar anyway it's great clean no blurryness somewhat matches it's name. Effect: 1.8/2 Pretty Inovative cancelling an Equip Card's Effect and u get to select what effect it gets, Idk something is still missing I think you could hav made the card more complicated. OCG: 2/2 understood the effect perfectly Balance: 1.8/2 Somewhat balanced the selected effects aren't that powerful. Overall: 9.3/10 Great Synchro Monster that utilizes Spell Equip Cards. Review a card using a PS3 is very difficult. [/quote] Thanks for the review LRPXD and don't worry about being late to comment. I'm just glad you took the time to comment/review my card [quote name='Dragon™' timestamp='1285727040' post='4665687'] Pendragon. Not a word I hear often. I really have no in-depth commentary to supply due to the several comments before me, so, I'm going to state that if this was real it'd be one of those secret rare holo cards you find in 7 or 13-card packs that you really love. I'd definately use it. Creative, although the card image is in redundantly bad quality. The only thing I see that might eventually turn too repetitive is the RFP-and-Draw destruction effect. I'd rather like it to have a limit of 5 or 6 times (to Draw), either that or a temporary card RFP or back to hand effect. Anyway, nice card- keep makin 'em. [/quote] Bad quality? I don't think it's bad...although I wouldn't really know. I can't tell the difference between good and bad quality pics unless they're noticeably obvious. As for the last effect, I don't really see how it could end up being repetitive, but then again, I wouldn't be surprised if someone found a way to abuse this card's effect. Anyways thanks for the comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emadbz Posted September 29, 2010 Report Share Posted September 29, 2010 pendragon is for the band? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engetsu Posted September 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2010 [quote name='emadbz' timestamp='1285785997' post='4666638'] pendragon is for the band? [/quote] What? Pendragon is a name, and it means "Chief Dragon". Please don't comment unless you have something to say about the card itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.