Ceasefire

[Buttercup]

[img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070602191653/yugioh/images/c/c8/CeasefireDB1-EN-SR-UE.jpg[/img]

Oh those crazy Europeans and their tech. Will this see similar play in the states? Discuss.

[Βyakuya]

Should be banned.

[Canadian]

[quote name='Byakuya Kuchiki' timestamp='1285615656' post='4661319']
Should be banned.
[/quote]
lol.

[Buttercup]

It's a burn card that can deal 2000 DMG realistically. It should be kept at 1.

[Fader]

[quote name='Byakuya Kuchiki' timestamp='1285615656' post='4661319']
Should be banned.
[/quote]
Utrollin

[Toffee.]

[quote name='Ser Warjacksworth' timestamp='1285616297' post='4661350']
It's a burn card that can deal 2000 DMG realistically.
[/quote]
On avarage, it does about 1500.

The damage it does is anywhere between 500 and 5,000.

[Fader]

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1285637995' post='4662538']
On avarage, it does about 1500.

The damage it does is anywhere between [b]0[/b] and 5,000.
[/quote]
Fix'd

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I like defusing face down Rykos with this.

[Just Crouton]

I like that you can activate it even when there aren't any face-down cards. I remember finishing an opponent in wc10 in a structure duel with this. Too much setup for the 5000 damage, but punishes the opponent for spamming lots of monsters quickly.

[DARKPLANT RISING]

[quote name='Byakuya Kuchiki' timestamp='1285615656' post='4661319']
Should be banned.
[/quote]
Since I'm nice, I'm going to just ask him kindly why he thought so.

OT: Burnlock decks, though lolzy when you use them, are highly annoying for the opponent and therefore is bad for the game in my opinion. I mean, we're doing this as a hobby, right? If the game gets boring, no one would play it.

[Buttercup]

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1285637995' post='4662538']
On average, it does about 1500.

The damage it does is anywhere between 500 and 5,000.
[/quote]

It still can in quite a few situations. That's like an easy 5 life burn in Magic.

[Toffee.]

[quote name='Adament Howls' timestamp='1285638404' post='4662562']
Fix'd
[/quote]
Explain [i]why[/i] you are running vanillas agenst a vanilla deck, and actually used this.

[darkwolf777]

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1285696907' post='4663726']
Explain [i]why[/i] you are running vanillas agenst a vanilla deck, and actually used this.
[/quote]

Being highly unlikely doesn't make it any less true though. Also, it doesn't have to be a vanilla deck x.o even my Relinquished Deck has Flamvell Guard for Advanced Ritual Art which I do set face-down if i draw it :<

[Outré]

Whatever happened to the times when we didnt make topics on DISKARDSHOODBEBANDLOL cards?

[CommanderVolt]

Unlimit this Konami.

[Buttercup]

[quote name='Tuatha Dé Danann' timestamp='1285700857' post='4664039']
Unlimit this Konami.
[/quote]

Chain Burn says sup.

[CommanderVolt]

[quote name='Ser Warjacksworth' timestamp='1285701983' post='4664112']
Chain Burn says sup.
[/quote]

That's what i was aimming for.

[Buttercup]

Don't try and bring back a noninteractive deck that's no fun for anyone.

[Fader]

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1285696907' post='4663726']
Explain [i]why[/i] you are running vanillas agenst a vanilla deck, and actually used this.
[/quote]
I dont have a single vanilla in my deck...but you said the minimum, the minimum is 0

[CommanderVolt]

[quote name='Ser Warjacksworth' timestamp='1285704028' post='4664253']
Don't try and bring back a noninteractive deck that's no fun for anyone.
[/quote]

sorry. i was just joking ;-;

[DARKPLANT RISING]

[quote name='Tuatha Dé Danann' timestamp='1285718658' post='4665145']
sorry. i was just joking ;-;
[/quote]
But it wasn't funny.
It was annoying.