DjaFe Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Rate/hate/comment You know the drill already Hope u like it ^^ [img]http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/4935/290872j.jpg[/img] [spoiler=LORE][b]Each turn, this card can attack as many of your opponent's monsters as the number of Equip Spell cards equipped to this monster. Once per turn you can select 1 face-up monster on the field. Equip this monster with all face-up Equip Cards on the field. If the target of the Equip Card is not correct, destroy the Equip Card. You can use this effect during either players turn.[/b][/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Erm... couple o' things. 1. It can't attack if it is not equipped, with how you worded the card. I get you were trying to limit it like Chimeratech, not being able to attack directly after attacking a monster, but still. Not sure how to correct that. 2. United Power, much? You need to tone the "equip all cards to one monster" down. Maybe... equip 2 Equip Spells to any monster on the field? Not bad for an, apparent, early card ^-^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjaFe Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Well i was going to limit it just like Chimaira~ because with few good equip spells its ATK would skyrocket. Its a warrior-type so most equip cards work fine with it and if i would allow it to directly atk after destroying a monster it would be 2 OP. The 2nd part u're right, might change something about it, maybe the effect allows you to change 1 card per turn and only during Main Phase, cuz I wasn't thinking 2 much about it that way. You could atk and then use its eff to equip another monster u've got, and thats kinda OP Thanks for the comments tough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 No, no, I was saying KEEP it like Chimera... but, how you have it worded means it cannot attack a Monster unless it is equipped =3 It was, just a bit. No prob ^-^ Yoi seem like you'll be a good Card Maker, and we need those. Oh, and a piece of advice: Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. It will make people's view of you increase drastically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjaFe Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 [quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286157342' post='4677940'] No, no, I was saying KEEP it like Chimera... but, how you have it worded means it cannot attack a Monster unless it is equipped =3 [/quote] Well thats the point If ur using this card in ur deck u should have equip spells to back it up. It cannot attack unless you equip it with a spell! [quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286157342' post='4677940'] Yoi seem like you'll be a good Card Maker, and we need those. [/quote] Thank you very much ^^ [quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286157342' post='4677940'] Oh, and a piece of advice: Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. It will make people's view of you increase drastically. [/quote] Could you point out any mistakes that I've made? ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMan Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 I was thinking the same thing Tainted Black..it cannot attack unless equipped with Equip Spell. Changing the card once per turn will make this card balanced, cuz it would be too much to change all Equip Spells during either players turn. But card itself is just fine ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjaFe Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Thank you for your comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 4, 2010 Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 You want it to be attack locked? O_O Don't say "2" in place of "To" or "Too". Things like that =3 And, of course ^-^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjaFe Posted October 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2010 Perhaps I should change its effect to get +1 atk per equip card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.