I feel like I don't get yelled at enough so [Super Polymerization]

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080523033410/yugioh/images/0/0e/SuperPolymerizationPTDN-EN-R-1E.png[/img]
Alright guys.

Let me say something.

I say that every deck that has Elemental Heroes in it should main Super Polymerization.

Especially after Great Tornado and The Shining are released.

The only meta deck I can think of where Super Polymerization would be dead against the TCG is Lightsworn. And that will be fixed with The Shining.

Here's a list of meta decks and what they have to use Super Poly on

Blackwings: Stardust/Brionac/Goyo/other EARTH, WATER, or Dragon Synchro makes Draco-Equiste/Ab0/Gaia
Sabers: Every monster in the Archetype makes Gaia
Flamvells: See BW. Also, if they use Cyber Dragon, you get Cyber Twin Dragon.
GB: Their monsters have many different attributes and I don't feel like looking up which ones have which attributes, but I know there are both EARTH and WATER monsters. Also, if they use Cyber Dragon, you get Cyber Twin Dragon.
Machina Gadgets(this isn't a topic to argue about whether Machina Gadgets are meta or not so just go with it): Card Trooper, Scrap Recycler, Gadgets, Machinas make Gaia. Also, if they use Cyber Dragon, you get Cyber Twin Dragon.
Scraps: They're all EARTH
I feel like I'm missing a deck. If I am, please lmk.

[Blake]

Drago-Equiste loves this card in a Yusei deck, or any Warrior deck.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286576839' post='4689128']
Drago-Equiste loves this card in a Yusei deck, or any Warrior deck.
[/quote]
This isn't a discussion on Super-Polymerization. This is a discussion on my opinion of Super Polymerization.

[Blake]

This is TCG >.>

You don't make threads for people to discuss YOUR ideas, you are here to talk about DECK ideas.

Also, I was saying this goes in a Yusei deck, or any Warrior deck...

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286576992' post='4689137']
This is TCG >.>

You don't make threads for people to discuss YOUR ideas, you are here to talk about DECK ideas.

Also, I was saying this goes in a Yusei deck, or any Warrior deck...
[/quote]
With your logic, I couldn't talk about my deck ideas.

[Canadian]

It's still a meh-ish card as of right now. The fact it can't gobble up Darks makes me upset, but I'm sure once the other generic E-Heroes are released, this will be alot better (depending on the fusions ofc).

[Blake]

Your DECK ideas are fine... but this section is not about how YOU think, solely. it's to discuss what this card is good for.

Such as Drago-Equistw.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286577285' post='4689160']
Your DECK ideas are fine... but this section is not about how YOU think, solely. it's to discuss what this card is good for.

Such as Drago-Equistw.
[/quote]
If I can't make a topic about what I think, how can I post my deck ideas?

@Canadian: The DARK thing is quite annoying, but most decks with DARKs use Synchros.

[Blake]

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1286577438' post='4689165']
If I can't make a topic about what I think, how can I post my deck ideas?
[/quote]
You're not getting it.

This section is to discuss USES.

Me saying Drago-Equiste is completely acceptable, as it is another deck than you listed.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286577521' post='4689169']
You're not getting it.

This section is to discuss USES.

Me saying Drago-Equiste is completely acceptable, as it is another deck than you listed.
[/quote]
No, this topic is about maining Super Poly in decks with E-Heroes. Nothing about a Warrior deck. Your post did not contribute to the topic. I am discussing an use. Also, I am getting it. But your grammar was flawed so I pointed it out. You saying something about Draco-Equiste is completely acceptable because you can summon it with a Hero + a Dragon Synchro. But when you add the Warrior deck thing, it makes you look stupid for a) disregarding the topic and thinking that "Warrior" is a deck.

Edit: f*** smilies. That's supposed to say b ) without the space.

[Blake]

I meant decks that run Warriors >_> Not as a deck, but anythingthat runs a good amount. I also said it works good with Drago-Equiste OR any deck that runs Warriors! I also mentioned Yusei decks.

Also, the topic is the CARD, as you said so with the very title. This is Yugioh TCG. This is not about what YOU think, solely, it is about how the card can be used.

Oh, and please, tell me. What grammar was flawed?

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286578277' post='4689208']
What grammar was flawed?
[/quote]
You said I couldn't post my opinion while saying this forum was for posting my ideas for how a card works in a deck.

Contradictory statements.

EDIT: Also, you specifically said Warrior Deck not a deck that has warriors in it.

[Blake]

I said nothing of the sort. I said that you cannot tell us to SOLELY discuss your opinion.

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286576992' post='4689137']
You don't make threads for people to discuss YOUR ideas, you are here to talk about DECK ideas.
[/quote]
Nowhere in that post did I say you cannot post your ideas. I just said you can't tell others to discuss them, and ignore the card itself.

Oh, and that's NOT a grammar flaw. At all. Grammar is capitalization, punctuation, and the like.

EDIT: I also put the word "Any" in front of it. As in any deck with a large warrior amount. I did not say Warrior was a deck, I said any Warrior Deck. [b]Any[/b].

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286578555' post='4689225']
I said nothing of the sort. I said that you cannot tell us to SOLELY discuss your opinion.


Nowhere in that post did I say you cannot post your ideas. I just said you can't tell others to discuss them, and ignore the card itself.
[/quote]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286576992' post='4689137']
This is TCG >.>

You don't make threads for people to discuss YOUR ideas
[/quote]
You're making an idiot of yourself.
[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286578555' post='4689225']
EDIT: I also put the word "Any" in front of it. As in any deck with a large warrior amount. I did not say Warrior was a deck, I said any Warrior Deck. [b]Any[/b].
[/quote]
any Warrior Deck implies Warrior as being a decktype

[Blake]

And see? You quoted me out of context. I said you make them to discuss DECK ideas for the card. your ideas are to be discussed, yes, but not solely yours, O' great one.

How does the word ANY imply that it's a deck type? I meant ANY deck with Warriors. Such as:
E-Heros
V-Heros
D-Heros
Ev-Heros
M-Heros
X-Sabers (Somewhat)
and others.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286579107' post='4689253']
And see? You quoted me out of context. I said you make them to discuss DECK ideas for the card. your ideas are to be discussed, yes, but not solely yours, O' great one.
[/quote]How did I quote you out of context? You didn't specify what you just specified in your original post. Therefore, your argument is invalid as it contains false information, O' contradictory one.
[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286579107' post='4689253']
How does the word ANY imply that it's a deck type? I meant ANY deck with Warriors. Such as:
E-Heros
V-Heros
D-Heros
Ev-Heros
M-Heros
X-Sabers (Somewhat)
and others.
[/quote]
Because M heroes and V heroes exist. :s

[Blake]

Yes, you did. You cut out the part about DECK ideas, making it seem like I simply told you to "STFU", whereas I actually said that your ideas are not to be the only ideas in the thread. Not invalid at all.

You don't know? Vision Heroes and Masked Heroes. Granted, there is only 1 Vision Hero (To my knowledge) in the TCG, and there are no Masked Heroes in the TCG, but they still exist, technically.

EDIT: I meant in the OCG, at the moment.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286579574' post='4689275']
Yes, you did. You cut out the part about DECK ideas, making it seem like I simply told you to "STFU", whereas I actually said that your ideas are not to be the only ideas in the thread. Not invalid at all.
[/quote]
Yes, it is invalid. Yes, I did cut out the part about deck ideas, but that's because it was unrelated to my point and you have contradicted yourself yet again. I never said my ideas are the only ones in the thread. I just said that this topic is about people's opinions on maining Super Poly in decks that main Heroes and hoping that commenters give reasons for their answers.[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286579574' post='4689275']
You don't know? Vision Heroes and Masked Heroes. Granted, there is only 1 Vision Hero (To my knowledge) in the TCG, and there are no Masked Heroes in the TCG, but they still exist, technically.
[/quote]
I do know. Vision Heroes and Masked Heroes exist in manga. And you're wrong. There are 0 Vision Heroes in the TCG. Trinity is OCG. Really obvious s***, bro.

[Blake]

Thus, your ideas, and you are contradicting [i]your[/i]self. No other decks are to be discussed, in your view, except E-Heros, AKA your appointed idea. So, only your idea can be discussed. My deck comment had everything to do, so you just skewed the info.

I edited, dude. Everybody makes mistakes.

I'm done with this. I can see you are one of those people who do not listen to reason, and believe themselves to be eternally right. Before you go saying the same about me, see the EDIT from my last post/the line above this one.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1286580091' post='4689301']
Thus, your ideas, and you are contradicting [i]your[/i]self. No other decks are to be discussed, in your view, except E-Heros, AKA your appointed idea. So, only your idea can be discussed. My deck comment had everything to do, so you just skewed the info.

I edited, dude. Everybody makes mistakes.

I'm done with this. I can see you are one of those people who do not listen to reason, and believe themselves to be eternally right. Before you go saying the same about me, see the EDIT from my last post/the line above this one.
[/quote]
The edit wasn't there when I hit reply. Also the line above where it says "the line above this one" reads "
I'm done with this. I can see you are one of those people who do not listen to reason, and believe themselves to be eternally" which seems to have nothing to do with what you are rambling about.
I don't think I'm eternally right, but this thread has made me think that you're eternally wrong.

[Nexev]

[quote name='Purple Whatevers' timestamp='1286576905' post='4689133']
This isn't a discussion on Super-Polymerization. This is a discussion on my opinion of Super Polymerization.
[/quote]
This is TCG forum, NOT the Purple Whatevers forum.

You must have misread.

It's about cards, not ego masturbation.

You can have your wrongasms in a different forum.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Nevert' timestamp='1286580328' post='4689318']
This is TCG forum, NOT the Purple Whatevers forum.

You must have misread.

It's about cards, not ego masturbation.

You can have your wrongasms in a different forum.
[/quote]
I didn't say it was the Purple Whatevers forum.

But as you should be able to see, this is my topic.

[Legend Zero]

Do you feel left out anymore? You got people to yell at you like you wanted. =D

The Generic Heroes really do make this thing amazing, imo. A dark varient would be nice though, since DARK is usually always a major type. At least at my lolcals...around 70% are BWs.

[Brandon Michael Geren]

[quote name='Legend Zero' timestamp='1286580828' post='4689339']
Do you feel left out anymore? You got people to yell at you like you wanted. =D

The Generic Heroes really do make this thing amazing, imo. A dark varient would be nice though, since DARK is usually always a major type. At least at my lolcals...around 70% are BWs.
[/quote]
Yeah, I did. I lol'd a couple of times at their flawed lawjiks.

BW and LS are the only decks I can think of where this would be dead for very long...

[Nexev]

[color="#FF0000"]Honestly it's not.

You are the creator but that means s***.

You lose the right to control the topic the moment you post the thread, there are exceptions sure, but only three.

If it's a club (thus you own club)

RP (you own rp)

Or if it's about your own cards since then the topic is supposed to be your own cards.

But this is the tcg thread, and that fits none of the above.

The reason this forum exists in the f***ing place is so people can discuss cards strategy, and all that s***.

Not "hey guys I think this works" and everyone either agreeing with you are calling you a fuckhole.

Cause then any time someone had a differening opinion there will be a new thread, and we will be chocked in the bs of people moaning or supporting their favorite cheapass cards. When all they could do is change it so the discussion is about the CARD and not the guys OPINION so there would be less pointless threads.

Because of this they actually put too and too together and got four, while you keep getting 12.4.

That's why it's called TCG and not "Guy's opinion on card of choice"[/color]