Jump to content

Darkrai (200th post anniversery)


Embittered Moon

Recommended Posts

[img]http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/516/208217q.jpg[/img]

thoughts?

*lore(sorry):This card cannot be normal summoned except by removing two DARK monsters from your side of the field from play. This card can only be special summoned from the graveyard. When this face up card is attacked, it gains 300 DEF. When this card is in attack position, it can't be destroyed by effect monsters' effects. When this card is attacks a light monster, it loses 300 ATK and DEF. When this card is attacked by a LIGHT monster, it loses 400 ATK and DEF.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[color="#800080"][center][i]"This card cannot be[/i] [b]Normal Summoned[/b] [i]except by removing two DARK monsters[/i] [b]on[/b] [i]your side of the field from play. This card can only be[/i] [b]Special Summoned[/b] [i]from the[/i] [b]Graveyard[/b]. [i]When this face up card is attacked, it gains 300 DEF. When this card is in attack position, it[/i] [b]cannot[/b] [i]be destroyed by effect monsters' effects. When this card is attacks a[/i] [b]LIGHT[/b] [i]monster, it loses 300 ATK and DEF. When this card is attacked by a LIGHT monster, it loses 400 ATK and DEF."[/i]

[b]Just a few capitalization erors you have here, nothing too big. However, you have both[/b] [i]"When this face up card is attacked, it gains 300 DEF."[/i] and [i]"When this card is attacked by a LIGHT monster, it loses 400 ATK and DEF."[/i] [b]The first effect doesn't sound like the last effect listed here lets iselft be negated. It looks something like this:[/b]

[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2600/DEF:2800][/i] [b]<------ I'm assuming he's in Defence Position.[/b]
[i]*Gets attacked by LIGHT monster*[/i] [b]<------- This is where my problem arises.[/b]
[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2600/DEF: 3100][/i] [b]<------- The first effect that takes place raises his DEF to 3100.[/b]
[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2200/DEF: 2700][/i] [b]<------- When all of Darkrai's effects finally resolve, he practically has the same DEF as he started with. Only his ATK and dropped significantly.

So I'm just wondering whether or not that's supposed to happen because it looks like it shouldn't. Since you cant see the "Fusion" part of his Type, I think it's okay that you use the Fusion template, so all in all, it's pretty good.[/b][/center][/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, but usually when i make legendarys i make them Divine-Beast, but Darkrai having like 3500 ATK is, well, non realistic.

[quote name='Mephiles of Darkness' timestamp='1287745029' post='4725399']
[color="#800080"][center][i]"This card cannot be[/i] [b]Normal Summoned[/b] [i]except by removing two DARK monsters[/i] [b]on[/b] [i]your side of the field from play. This card can only be[/i] [b]Special Summoned[/b] [i]from the[/i] [b]Graveyard[/b]. [i]When this face up card is attacked, it gains 300 DEF. When this card is in attack position, it[/i] [b]cannot[/b] [i]be destroyed by effect monsters' effects. When this card is attacks a[/i] [b]LIGHT[/b] [i]monster, it loses 300 ATK and DEF. When this card is attacked by a LIGHT monster, it loses 400 ATK and DEF."[/i]

[b]Just a few capitalization erors you have here, nothing too big. However, you have both[/b] [i]"When this face up card is attacked, it gains 300 DEF."[/i] and [i]"When this card is attacked by a LIGHT monster, it loses 400 ATK and DEF."[/i] [b]The first effect doesn't sound like the last effect listed here lets iselft be negated. It looks something like this:[/b]

[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2600/DEF:2800][/i] [b]<------ I'm assuming he's in Defence Position.[/b]
[i]*Gets attacked by LIGHT monster*[/i] [b]<------- This is where my problem arises.[/b]
[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2600/DEF: 3100][/i] [b]<------- The first effect that takes place raises his DEF to 3100.[/b]
[i]Darkrai [ATK: 2200/DEF: 2700][/i] [b]<------- When all of Darkrai's effects finally resolve, he practically has the same DEF as he started with. Only his ATK and dropped significantly.

So I'm just wondering whether or not that's supposed to happen because it looks like it shouldn't. Since you cant see the "Fusion" part of his Type, I think it's okay that you use the Fusion template, so all in all, it's pretty good.[/b][/center][/color]
thanks, and this was an earlier card of mine, so it's not going to be perfect.
also i thought if i used the fusion template it would look cooler.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...