Lord Smeagle Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 [center] Since the Polar God Kings suck noodles now, this is NOT intended to be support. Could be the beginning of a set of Warrior or Beast Unions that...don't suck? [img]http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/2194/85968r.jpg[/img] Once per turn, you can remove 1 Tuner and 1 Union monster in your Graveyard from play to add 1 non-Tuner Warrior-Type monster from your Deck to your hand. Once per turn, you can equip this card to a Warrior-Type monster you control OR unequip it to Special Summon this card in face-up Attack Position. If this card is equipped to a Level 4 or lower monster, that card gains 1500 ATK and is unaffected by Trap Cards. If this card is equipped to a Level 5-8 monster, that card gains 1000 ATK and its effects cannot be negated. If this card is equipped to a Level 9 or higher monster, you can decrease its ATK by 1000 in order to have that card attack directly. This card inflicts Piercing Damage. Jazin Kay[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Duferier Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 "this card inflicts piercing damage." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
°•Dragon Ball•° Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 [quote name='Shiny Azelf Fan 333' timestamp='1290246276' post='4797277'] "this card inflicts piercing damage." [/quote] Lord Smeargle im sure that dose not make sense like shiny azelfs quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 "Piercing Damage" is perfectly fine... or do you want write "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Damage to your opponent." every single time? Anyways, this would really fit into a Deck that focusses on Polar Gods... if the Polar Gods were Warriors :/ Odin is a Fairy, Thor a Beast-Warrior and Loki a Spellcaster, and since this [i]is[/i] Odin's horse, you should at least make it work with him Other than that: I find it to be a little too strong on it's own, I doubt anybody would equip this card. Sure, in certain situations it can come in handy, especially with a Level 9+ monster, but getting that out [i]and[/i] this one is going to be kinda tough. Maybe lower it's level and stats a little, so it's more like a specific "Armory Arm"? Overall, nice Warrior-Support, but as a supporting card it's most likely too hard to get it out, and as a fighter on it's own, it doesn't need all that stuff that comes with it. Though you could also proove me wrong, what did you think this card would combo with when you created it? So long, Spoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 Piercing damage looks ugly. Also the polar gods don't suck. They have amazing support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted November 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 [quote name='ze super cat' timestamp='1290261587' post='4797470'] Piercing damage looks ugly. [/quote] It's a lot prettier than stretching the page to an awkward and microscopic font; the effect is long enough as it is. Also, Cyberdark Horn. [quote name='ze super cat'] Also the polar gods don't suck. They have amazing support. [/quote] Their effects went from amazing and interesting to ok and boring as hell, therefore they suck regardless of what support they have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
°•Dragon Ball•° Posted November 20, 2010 Report Share Posted November 20, 2010 [quote name='Spoon' timestamp='1290247823' post='4797291'] "Piercing Damage" is perfectly fine... or do you want write "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Damage to your opponent." every single time? Anyways, this would really fit into a Deck that focusses on Polar Gods... if the Polar Gods were Warriors :/ Odin is a Fairy, Thor a Beast-Warrior and Loki a Spellcaster, and since this [i]is[/i] Odin's horse, you should at least make it work with him Other than that: I find it to be a little too strong on it's own, I doubt anybody would equip this card. Sure, in certain situations it can come in handy, especially with a Level 9+ monster, but getting that out [i]and[/i] this one is going to be kinda tough. Maybe lower it's level and stats a little, so it's more like a specific "Armory Arm"? Overall, nice Warrior-Support, but as a supporting card it's most likely too hard to get it out, and as a fighter on it's own, it doesn't need all that stuff that comes with it. Though you could also proove me wrong, what did you think this card would combo with when you created it? So long, Spoon [/quote] Good point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
judedudemude Posted November 21, 2010 Report Share Posted November 21, 2010 im no genuis but why not copy and paste "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Damage to your opponent." and inflict percing damange is yugioh slang its not offical yugioh ocg YET people who want inflict percing damange as offical yugioh ocg can do something i guess but i do not want inflict percing damange as offical yugioh ocg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.