Jump to content

Fallback!


~Shadow of Alpha~

Recommended Posts

[center][img]http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/2756/293562.jpg[/img]
[spoiler=Lore]
[b]Activate only when a face-up monster on your side of the field is selected as an attack target by an opponents monster. Return the targeted monster to your hand and Special Summon 1 monster from your hand who is 1 Level higher than the targeted monster.[/b]
[/spoiler][/center]

Yes, I realize that it resembles Relieve Monster.

Hate, Rate whatever.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can even summon Synchros? God, If I had this card yesterday I could have pwned my friend xD Creative effects, btw.

PS: Nice member card, lemme fix the OCG for you:
"Each time this card [b]destroys[/b] a LIGHT monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the original DEF of the destroyed monster."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Venom' timestamp='1290709502' post='4809448']
You can even summon Synchros? God, If I had this card yesterday I could have pwned my friend xD Creative effects, btw.

PS: Nice member card, lemme fix the OCG for you:
"Each time this card [b]destroys[/b] a LIGHT monster by battle, inflict damage to your opponent equal to half the original DEF of the destroyed monster."
[/quote]

Uuuum.....WHAT?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='GladiatorBeastAleksander' timestamp='1290715605' post='4809630']
Well yeah, I mean it has to have some drawback.

[b]No it doesn't.[/b]

And if konami's attitude would be, "I would just use..." then they wouldn't make anymore cards would they?

[b]I'm just saying there are better cards than this and why fill your Deck with this when you can fill it with more useful ones? I'm saying it can improve. I'm not saying "LOL UR CRAD IS DUMB. THERE R LOTSA CARDS THT R BETR." So don't get offended and take critisism.[/b]
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, from what in my relpy made it sound like I was offended and couldn't take critisism? Have you read my sig?
I see what you mean, it's just that I don't want people to reply that it needs a drawback, so I'm a little careful with that :) But you prove a good point, and yes, the attack proceeds to the new monster but I'm not sure how to write that :/ any suggestions? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...