beefman Posted December 12, 2010 Report Share Posted December 12, 2010 The first of it's kind, a special kind of fusion monster. It's in AoC because I'm not sure what your reactions will be. [img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/4491/226908.jpg[/img] Lore: 2 monster cards with the same name The original ATK and DEF become the ATK of one of the monsters used to Summon this card +1000. When this card is face-up on the field, it's type is treated as the same type as one of the monsters used to Summon this card. This card can attack twice in the same Battle Phase. Once per turn, if this card would be destroyed as a result of battle, it is not destroyed. (Battle Damage is applied normally.) Hope u like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 13, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2010 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2010 Anyone? Please? Bumparooski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neutrality Man Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 [quote]Lore: 2 monster cards with the same name The original ATK and DEF become the ATK of one of the monsters used to Summon this card +1000. When this card is face-up on the field, it's type is treated as the same type as one of the monsters used to Summon this card. This card can attack twice in the same Battle Phase. Once per turn, if this card would be destroyed as a result of battle, it is not destroyed. (Battle Damage is applied normally.)[/quote] I see nothing wrong with the OCG... but I'm still using the old pre-5D's dialect, myself. I love the concept. a LITERAL fusion monster, like what Duelist Kingdom tried to make the BEUD into (and failed horribly). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heavens Guardian Posted December 16, 2010 Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Grammer is better then mine but not perfect 9 stars( good card) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2010 Ha. You're all commenting on the grammar. Don't forget, it's AoC. Thanks for the rates though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Bump...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Chess Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 I think the card is normal, the OCG is OK, everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 A rating plz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepperyena Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Damn, I want it! I'd definately use it if I could! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow-Master Posted December 30, 2010 Report Share Posted December 30, 2010 Cool card. I'd give it a 9/10. The only bad part that I can see about this is probably using polymerization on 2 really weak cards like Mokey Mokey or something like that. You can fuse two incredibly useless cards to form a much more stronger card. Seems a little rigged ( a little ), but nonetheless a great idea. P.S. I know this is off-topic, but, what are Synchro Cards? I've never heard of them before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 [quote name='Pepperyena' timestamp='1293742104' post='4897102'] Damn, I want it! I'd definately use it if I could! [/quote] I love hearing that, but a rating...? [quote name='Shadow-Master' timestamp='1293744571' post='4897220'] Cool card. I'd give it a 9/10. The only bad part that I can see about this is probably using polymerization on 2 really weak cards like Mokey Mokey or something like that. You can fuse two incredibly useless cards to form a much more stronger card. Seems a little rigged ( a little ), but nonetheless a great idea. P.S. I know this is off-topic, but, what are Synchro Cards? I've never heard of them before. [/quote] Speaking of useless cards, how bout a mokey mokey with 1300 ATK that can attack twice? LOL +: Synchros are a mix of fusions and rituals. You take the material (_______ + 1 or more _______, like that of a fusion monster), make sure the material is on the field, and also make sure that the materials' levels = equal or more the synchros level. Example, road warrior, a level 8, says "Road Synchron" + 1 or more non-tuner monsters (meaning the rest of the material can NOT say "tuner" after the type). So if you have Road Synchron and a level 4 monster (4 + 4 = 8 ), send them to the grave to synchro summon road warrior! P.S. Synchros are kick-*** white, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow-Master Posted December 31, 2010 Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 Oh nice. I've never used them before, are they in 5D's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted December 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2010 [quote name='Shadow-Master' timestamp='1293761867' post='4898013'] Oh nice. I've never used them before, are they in 5D's? [/quote] Yes. Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted January 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hyde Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Great Card. I love the concept. It's pretty original and the pic is pretty baller to. Nice job man. 9/10 OCG correction: This card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase. It would've been a 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenogears Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Alright; OCG is OK, pic is good, effect is good... so it deserves a 9/10 from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted January 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Thanks to all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.