CQB Spartan Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 Hey guys, this is my 1st card! [img]http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/1323/339764.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow137 Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 pretty decent for a vanilla. i like the description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
**_Xan_-_-_ Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 Not much ppl make vanilla as their first card so i cant fix no ocg error but it seems like a common card with 2.5k atk but only 6 stars? 1 tribue to get this dude kind of like a summoned skull remake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallMDel Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 The description is simple yet effective. Love it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 As a vanilla connoisseur myself and somewhat of an expert myself, I have to commend you for making your first card a vanilla. I sometimes feel disappointed that most YCM members are not interested in vanillas but like it or not vanillas play a huge role in the history of the game and although they have very little tactical power, they have a strong sentimental value and have inspired much in the YGO world, how many people honestly have to admit that upon seeing the BEWD or DM you fell in love with the game. The second misconception about vanillas are that they are easy to create, this is not strictly true. Obviously it is harder to create a good effect card because more planning has to go into it but in terms of making a top vanilla card you have to make sure that not only the image name and LORE are immaculate but that they combine in a way that catches attention. So there is more that goes into vanillas than what most people believe and I believe that it is important that they are not forgotten. ***PHIEW*** now that I have got that off my chest I can comment on the card. As I said I commend you for making this and it's a very respectful first effort. I like the name and I especially like the description, its short sweet and does the card a service. My only fault is the image, don't get me wrong it's a half decent image but it's a little bit squashed, not central enough and ill-defined, having said that, it is by no means catastrophic but it is by no means perfect either, its smack dab in the middle. A good first effort, well done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 the description is quite good, though i can't really comment on this since it is a vanilla, but still good pic, i'd give it a 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.area51player. Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 [b]I've always enjoyed Vanillas. Picture is awesome, description is simple, but fine. For a first card, it's not bad at all.[/b] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CQB Spartan Posted January 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 [quote name='chedbonlahor' timestamp='1293983223' post='4905998'] As a vanilla connoisseur myself and somewhat of an expert myself, I have to commend you for making your first card a vanilla. I sometimes feel disappointed that most YCM members are not interested in vanillas but like it or not vanillas play a huge role in the [b]history of the game and although they have very little tactical power, they have a strong sentimental value and have inspired much in the YGO world,[/b] how many people honestly have to admit that upon seeing the BEWD or DM you fell in love with the game. The second misconception about vanillas are that they are easy to create, this is not strictly true. Obviously it is harder to create a good effect card because more planning has to go into it but in terms of making a top vanilla card you have to make sure that not only the image name and LORE are immaculate but that they combine in a way that catches attention. So there is more that goes into vanillas than what most people believe and I believe that it is important that they are not forgotten. ***PHIEW*** now that I have got that off my chest I can comment on the card. As I said I commend you for making this and it's a very respectful first effort. I like the name and I especially like the description, its short sweet and does the card a service. My only fault is the image, don't get me wrong it's a half decent image but it's a little bit squashed, not central enough and ill-defined, having said that, it is by no means catastrophic but it is by no means perfect either, its smack dab in the middle. A good first effort, well done [/quote] EXAMPLES:Dark Magician, Red Eyes-Black Dragon, Summoned Skull. etc.Btw,guys how do I change my member title? I was looking in my User CP and couldn't find it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow-Master Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 The card is all right for a non-effect card. I'lll give it 9.5/10. It seems a bit bland though. The description is all right, that card is just missing a little something. Also, why do people call these cards "vanilla"? Makes me think of that kind of icecream. What about "normal" cards? They fit the description perfectly. If it was a "vanilla" card, I'd have to call the effect cards "beige", or the fusion cards "Grape". It just doesn't seem right. [quote name='Long ShotArrow' timestamp='1293995073' post='4906641'] EXAMPLES:Dark Magician, Red Eyes-Black Dragon, Summoned Skull. etc. Btw,guys how do I change my member title? I was looking in my User CP and couldn't find it. [/quote] Wait 30 days from now and you can change it. You have to go to "settings" in your profile to change it. (where it says "change display name" on the left categories) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CQB Spartan Posted January 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 [quote name='Shadow-Master' timestamp='1293995267' post='4906653'] The card is all right for a non-effect card. I'lll give it 9.5/10. It seems a bit bland though. The description is all right, that card is just missing a little something. Also, why do people call these cards "vanilla"? Makes me think of that kind of icecream. What about "normal" cards? They fit the description perfectly. If it was a "vanilla" card, I'd have to call the effect cards "beige", or the fusion cards "Grape". It just doesn't seem right. Wait 30 days from now and you can change it. You have to go to "settings" in your profile to change it. (where it says "[b]change display name[/b]" on the left categories) [/quote]No not Display name, [b]member title[/b], you know where it says member or new member, I am trying to change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 [quote name='Shadow-Master' timestamp='1293995267' post='4906653'] The card is all right for a non-effect card. I'lll give it 9.5/10. It seems a bit bland though. The description is all right, that card is just missing a little something. Also, why do people call these cards "vanilla"? Makes me think of that kind of icecream. What about "normal" cards? They fit the description perfectly. If it was a "vanilla" card, I'd have to call the effect cards "beige", or the fusion cards "Grape". It just doesn't seem right. Wait 30 days from now and you can change it. You have to go to "settings" in your profile to change it. (where it says "change display name" on the left categories) [/quote] Vanillas are called vanillas that's just what they are referred to as here, it shouldn't be long before you are using it fluently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
**_Xan_-_-_ Posted January 2, 2011 Report Share Posted January 2, 2011 There is a questions and answer section i belive. Go look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.