The Little Green Man

[Azuh]

i didnr kno that bumping threads before 24 hrs is spam/illegal?

 

see Miranda... Frunks done the right thing... you havent... he waited 28 hours... you waited like 5 seconds... so yeah >.<

 

Anyways... i still believe its some sort of Star Wars character that got lost in space when filming on Tatooie >.<

[DAJ]

alien? little green alien? COOL! i would bev funny if it was a alien

[Frunk]

EUREKA!

 

I've found NASA's official image, I'll warn you though, it's HUGE, and may lag some of you. Our little green friend is on the far left hand side, and about 4/5 of the way down the page (may vary depending on your monitor and/or resolution)

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10214.jpg

[JesusofChaos™]

I completed beileve that we are not alone in the universe or even our solar system. If anyone saw how small we are compared to other galaxys in another post. It is beyond plausable and statiscally probability that we are alone. Also i beileve that there may be some official UFOs that have visited us. I mean say that if someone told you they are giving away £100 down the street u wouldnt beileve them but if 100,000 people told you then you would beileve them, i beileve it is the same with UFOs. Some of them are properly fakes or goverement experiments but some i think is real. Scientist beileve that it is impossible to travel at the speed of light (because of relativity) but just imagine if we could. Most people say we cant and never will. This is Human narrowmindness that cannot gauge impossible things.

[zachy_syko]

maybe its one of those sand people (Tusken Raiders) off Star Wars?

 

 

lol i totally agree. next thing u know they'll have a pic of r2d2 and luke skywalker pulling up in a speeder! :lol: jokes

 

theres a big possibility that there could be life on mars cause scientists reckon that there's a glacier or something there. but why isnt there more pics of it? if it was a lifeform why isnt there any pics of it moving? hmm seems suss.

[Azuh]

EUREKA!

 

I've found NASA's official image' date=' I'll warn you though, it's HUGE, and may lag some of you. Our little green friend is on the far left hand side, and about 4/5 of the way down the page (may vary depending on your monitor and/or resolution)

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10214.jpg

[/quote']

 

before you use the word eureka... i suspect you give thanks to the Victorians for making such a word

 

XD

[zachy_syko]

EUREKA!

 

I've found NASA's official image' date=' I'll warn you though, it's HUGE, and may lag some of you. Our little green friend is on the far left hand side, and about 4/5 of the way down the page (may vary depending on your monitor and/or resolution)

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10214.jpg

[/quote']

 

before you use the word eureka... i suspect you give thanks to the Victorians for making such a word

 

XD

 

whaddya mean by victorians as in ppl from australia (like me) or queen victoria? lol idk which one u mean? cause theres the eureaka stockade and eureka tower both in australia so....soz for goin off topic.

[zhymet2]

EUREKA!

 

I've found NASA's official image' date=' I'll warn you though, it's HUGE, and may lag some of you. Our little green friend is on the far left hand side, and about 4/5 of the way down the page (may vary depending on your monitor and/or resolution)

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10214.jpg

[/quote']

 

hmmm i looked at it carefully and its most likely a rock

 

but i do belive there are aliens but thats probobly

not an aliean

[Frunk]

EUREKA!

 

I've found NASA's official image' date=' I'll warn you though, it's HUGE, and may lag some of you. Our little green friend is on the far left hand side, and about 4/5 of the way down the page (may vary depending on your monitor and/or resolution)

 

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10214.jpg

[/quote']

 

before you use the word eureka... i suspect you give thanks to the Victorians for making such a word

 

XD

 

Victorians? You crazy drunkard, Archimedes invented the word! It means "I've found it".

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_%28word%29

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes

[Static]

The Image is fake. The zooms are edited. There is no hand in the original. Meh' date=' I can't tell. I still do not believe that a human statue would be on [b']THEIR[/b] surface, unless there is knowledge that we are from mars.

 

Despite not totally understanding your second sentance, this goes back to my opinion of the arrogance of many members of the human race about extraterrestrial life. Why, oh why would we be the only ones? We can't be the only planet with the "right conditions", that is, if these conditions are even required to sustain life other than that of our own and our neighbouring animal species? For all our close-minded selves could know, "alien" civilations could consider burning heat standard, live of dirt, and not need to breathe at all. We really need to get better imaginations, even me despite being the instigator of this planned rapid change, there are things that "they" could consider standard that are completely incomprhensible to me.

 

Bolded = corrected. Anything that is not observed, does not exist. If we don't know of aliens existing, they don't existing. A "World" as we know it, does not exist, just perception of a plane of existence that exists only in our minds. Whatever our mind perceives, through perception of senses, perception of time, and perception of thought, DEFINES COMPLETELY all that we know. In a more literal tone, why does it matter? If it hasn't affected us, then surely there's no reason to be concerned with it. (I will admit, that last line was very Narcissistic.)

 

very interesting Frunk. I am kinda neutral right now' date=' but if they take another picture and it's not there I will be less skeptical. ^_^

[/quote']

 

They can't. The rovers DIED like a couple years ago.

 

Years? This was taken in November '07...

 

I would not believe that. I know for a fact, that they stopped moving more than a year ago. Still able to take pictures? Perhaps, but I'm not going to argue this, its a waste of time, ESPECIALLY when the proper information is right on the NASA website.

[Silencerleader]

I see nothing Frunk...from that pic. you sent.

[Frunk]

The Image is fake. The zooms are edited. There is no hand in the original. Meh' date=' I can't tell. I still do not believe that a human statue would be on [b']THEIR[/b] surface, unless there is knowledge that we are from mars.

 

Despite not totally understanding your second sentance, this goes back to my opinion of the arrogance of many members of the human race about extraterrestrial life. Why, oh why would we be the only ones? We can't be the only planet with the "right conditions", that is, if these conditions are even required to sustain life other than that of our own and our neighbouring animal species? For all our close-minded selves could know, "alien" civilations could consider burning heat standard, live of dirt, and not need to breathe at all. We really need to get better imaginations, even me despite being the instigator of this planned rapid change, there are things that "they" could consider standard that are completely incomprhensible to me.

 

Bolded = corrected. Anything that is not observed, does not exist. If we don't know of aliens existing, they don't existing. A "World" as we know it, does not exist, just perception of a plane of existence that exists only in our minds. Whatever our mind perceives, through perception of senses, perception of time, and perception of thought, DEFINES COMPLETELY all that we know. In a more literal tone, why does it matter? If it hasn't affected us, then surely there's no reason to be concerned with it. (I will admit, that last line was very Narcissistic.)

 

very interesting Frunk. I am kinda neutral right now' date=' but if they take another picture and it's not there I will be less skeptical. ^_^

[/quote']

 

They can't. The rovers DIED like a couple years ago.

 

Years? This was taken in November '07...

 

I would not believe that. I know for a fact, that they stopped moving more than a year ago. Still able to take pictures? Perhaps, but I'm not going to argue this, its a waste of time, ESPECIALLY when the proper information is right on the NASA website.

 

Fair enough on the first quote, I will not try and argue that something we cannot see is infact that. I'm not saying there is, definately, intellegent life out there other than our own. However if we merely state that we cannot see "any dirt under the rug before we check", then we're probably not the most intellegent.

 

I would appreciate a link to this alleged information though, considering it would facsinate me how in the other images that you can find by browsing the link I provided in the first post, tracks from one of the rovers are in the image (from the twin rover, "Opportunity", as opposed to the other twin that took the "little green man" image, "Spirit"). As far as I know, these two rovers, are in full working order.

 

Silencerleader: You see the green-looking rocks and bumps in the bottom-left-hand-corner of the image? Look at the top of these rocks, and there you will see our green shape.

[(!Death!Reborn!)]

When it's not close up it looks fake but when it is close up it is real

[Speed Dragon90]

I've been looking at this pic alot and it just seems to stand out way too much to be some random shaped rock, I'm started to lean toward strange green statue or this is an undiscovered life form that can survive in conditions we obviously can not.

[(!Death!Reborn!)]

So what does that mean?

[Frunk]

Thank you Speed, I'm glad to see someone else gets it.

 

Anyone else who is intellectual enough, scan the giant picture in the link I posted, do any of you see any more rocks of (not of all, of or) the same colour, or the same texture, the same shape, or the same size? Why is this oddly coloured rock the only one here here?

 

One may argue, "Well, there are no similar rocks as you say Frunk, but doesn't that mean there are no similar statues or similar aliens to that one", well, no, because I'm guessing, if this is a living being, it is highly primitive and is probably scouting out the rover for his tribe, performing normal foraging, exploring, or just wondering idly.

 

If it is a statue, it's possible it could be a placemark, or a similar kind of marker, etc. Similar to a sign you would see when driving along a country road. Do you see a sign every 5 metres? No, you see one everyone once in a while, which is what this would be.

[Silencerleader]

Interesting.