Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='War Chess' timestamp='1295188523' post='4938247'] Semi-Limited : Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys. Its Heavy Storm with some chance to be negated. Do it ! [/quote] Get the f*** out of my thread you horrible player. HEAVY STORM SHOULD BE AT 3 BECAUSE PHOENIX IS ABLE TO ATTACK AND IS REUSABLE AND THIS CAN BE NEGATED BY MORE THINGS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Chess Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='Placido.' timestamp='1295188900' post='4938257'] Get the f*** out of my thread you horrible player. HEAVY STORM SHOULD BE AT 3 BECAUSE PHOENIX IS ABLE TO ATTACK AND IS REUSABLE AND THIS CAN BE NEGATED BY MORE THINGS. [/quote] Heavy Storm should be at 3 ? It should stay at forbidden, all it could go its to 1. And Phoenix should be at 2. Its not to much ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='War Chess' timestamp='1295189029' post='4938260'] Heavy Storm should be at 3 ? It should stay at forbidden, all it could go its to 1. And Phoenix should be at 2. Its not to much ! [/quote] You said this was Heavy Storm. Heavy Storm can only be used once, this can be used multiple times. Heavy Storm in multiples > Heavy Storm once. This at 2 means Heavy should be at 3 because its worse. I'm using your logic. You are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Chess Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 OK, so this should be at 1 and Heavy at 2, according to your logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 I'm being sarcastic. This should be at 3 and Heavy should be at 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Chess Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 I still think this should be at 2, and Heavy either at 0 or 1. Anyway, I'm out. As you don't accept opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Reposting some of my suggestions that never made it with reasons: Limited: Dandylion (Quickdraw and Debris is too fast with this running around. By putting it at one it becomes alot more inconsistant and easy to deal with) Unlimited: Necro Guardna (no reason why it was ever put at 1 in the first place. Lightsworns aren't even that big of a threat anymore) Gold Sarcophagus (We have duality now and waiting 2 turns is an aweful lot for this to be useful) MST (It'd be interesting. We lost our mass S/T removal and having 3 one for one removals would be nice) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1295191309' post='4938317'] Reposting some of my suggestions that never made it with reasons: Limited: Dandylion (Quickdraw and Debris is too fast with this running around. By putting it at one it becomes alot more inconsistant and easy to deal with) Unlimited: Necro Guardna (no reason why it was ever put at 1 in the first place. Lightsworns aren't even that big of a threat anymore) Gold Sarcophagus (We have duality now and waiting 2 turns is an aweful lot for this to be useful) MST (It'd be interesting. We lost our mass S/T removal and having 3 one for one removals would be nice) [/quote] yeah I can understand all of those. also @bad player; I accept opinions, not stupidity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 lol @debris being a fast deck if it ain't broken, don't try to fix it the banlist is not for destroying good decks, but for weakening overpowered ones. Necro is bad card design but the card itself is not that strong. Why did konami put it on the list before Wulf is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Imperial Order @1. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1295191738' post='4938329'] lol @debris being a fast deck if it ain't broken, don't try to fix it the banlist is not for destroying good decks, but for weakening overpowered ones. Necro is bad card design but the card itself is not that strong. Why did konami put it on the list before Wulf is beyond me. [/quote] Dandy at 2 though allows for ridiculously stupid stuff to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Imperial would slow the game down alot. Although, i'd figure, alot of Decks would go down the path of running 10+ traps to compensate for fewer spells. Food for thought: Banned: Broken Fusions Unlimited: Future Fusion Overload Fusion ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 So, ban FGD, Chimeratechs, what else would be needed? Ab0? Is that really a threat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='Sephiroth_The_Legend' timestamp='1295192962' post='4938353'] Banned: Broken Fusions Unlimited: Future Fusion Overload Fusion [/quote] This will never happen. Future Fusion is foolish burial for too many decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='-Griffin' timestamp='1295163377' post='4937717'] Tsukyomi is really fun, but with Mask of Darkness and (Drastic) Drop Off, it just feels like it could be annoying. Still, I feel that might not be consistent enough to be an issue, so I guess @1 for a format to see how things move. [/quote] Mist Valley Falcon can do the same thing and it's @3. But nobody plays that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 [quote name='RobotBowtieOfDestruction' timestamp='1295198606' post='4938520'] Mist Valley Falcon can do the same thing and it's @3. But nobody plays that. [/quote] Which is why I said it could be tested. MVF also sticks around the field more so is easier to hit, but yeah, I don't think it's an actual problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 X-Sabers need to be hit. Ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Rule so that Darksoul only works once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Grand Mole needs to move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderVolt Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Limit Faultroll and fix Dark soul's ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 The banlist doesnt make the ruling :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Placido, are you gonna update the OG post? @grand mole: 1 is fine, its such a powerful anti meta card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted January 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 yeah, but to fix sabers that ruling needs to be put into place. and I will but I need to know changes that everyone agrees on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 i agree with grand mole @1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.