Dugal Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 [center]Malaak the Swift [img]http://img858.imageshack.us/img858/9363/392703.jpg[/img] Effect: This card cannot be Special Summoned. If this card destroys a Monster by battle, you can destroy 1 Face-up Spell or Trap card on your opponent's field. If this card is destroyed by the effect of a Spell or Trap card, discard 1 card from your hand.[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 [color=#1C2837][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]This card cannot be Special Summoned. If this card destroys a [b]m[/b]onster by battle, you can destroy 1 [b]f[/b]ace-up Spell or Trap card on your opponent's [b]side of the[/b] field. If this card is destroyed by the effect of a Spell or Trap card, discard 1 card from your hand.[/font][/color] use that OCG or if someone puts a better one use that xD kinda bland but nice for your first card 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 i think the OCG fix would be this: This card cannot be Special Summoned. If this card destroys a [b]m[/b]onster by battle, you can destroy 1 [b]f[/b]ace-up Spell or Trap card your opponent [b]controls[/b]. If this card is destroyed by the effect of a Spell or Trap card, discard 1 card from your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dugal Posted April 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 wait, so, which is correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 ~Burning Soul~'s is correct xD when i was doing it i looked over a few things LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 No need for me to say anything on the OCG since it's already been corrected So let's move to the card and the effect themselves Personally I find 1800 atk a bit too weak for lv5, you might consider raising it higher Overall the effect looks simple but rather effective in card discarding, though at the end you should also add an alternative, in case there's no cards in your hand to discard I'll give this one an 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inexplicable Madness Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 Burning Soul already perfected the OCG soo... I would elaborate more on the effect cuz what happens when you run out of cards? lol EDIT: I also find this a little OP'ed This is pretty good for your first card so I'll give you a 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dugal Posted April 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1302374958' post='5125445'] No need for me to say anything on the OCG since it's already been corrected So let's move to the card and the effect themselves Personally I find 1800 atk a bit too weak for lv5, you might consider raising it higher Overall the effect looks simple but rather effective in card discarding, though at the end you should also add an alternative, in case there's no cards in your hand to discard I'll give this one an 8.4/10 [/quote] I felt making the ATK 1800 balanced out it's effect a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 Maybe. I guess I'm just too used to thinking Spell Canceler when I saw that, and we all know that isn't anywhere near the belief it's the "Jinzo for spell cards" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 [quote name='Dugal' timestamp='1302379324' post='5125729'] I felt making the ATK 1800 balanced out it's effect a bit [/quote] Not really, since face-up cards aren't too common unless your opponent mains Decree, plays Crystal Beasts or runs Chain Burn, all of which this wouldn't hurt too much. Besides, the no SS clause limits it well enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.