Parting Shot Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 [center] Wow, it's been quite awhile since I posted any cards. Here's a pair of unrelated cards to break my silence, lol. Nothing special, just simple cards. ~||~ [img]http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6623/15969x.jpg[/img][img]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7629/15969j.jpg[/img] ~||~ [u][b]Artist Credit:[/b][/u] Artists Unknown [/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbull rules Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 The cards are very simple but I cannot see any obvious flaws. I think they are overall very good. The K.I.S.S. method works. 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy Posted May 9, 2011 Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 They're both alright, but then again I havent done much better lately either. Hope to see you post MUCH more ^^. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2011 Thanks guys. Yeah, they're simple, but hopefully once I get my creative juices flowing again I'll make more involved effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 10, 2011 Le BUMP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 This is the first time i see Zalpyr post here Card 1 > would it better if it is a Normal Spell Card? did we can attack during our opponent's turn? CARD 2 > Awesome and super useful, you miss caps in Calculation. That is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 your 2nd card is just fine, I see nothing wrong with it Card #1, however, is OPed as hell All you said was a face up monster, you didn't specify what type of monster or for that matter, on a more important matter, its stats therefore, you're suggesting you can use a 5000 atk monster to attack your opponent directly and that is WAY too easy for a OTK set up so I recommend you make sure to tune the battle damage down a bit 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EddieGS25 Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 2nd card is very nice, like the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 [quote name='Maha Guns' timestamp='1305109759' post='5202619'] This is the first time i see Zalpyr post here Card 1 > would it better if it is a Normal Spell Card? did we can attack during our opponent's turn? CARD 2 > Awesome and super useful, you miss caps in Calculation. That is [/quote] I made it a quick-play so you could flip it up and surprise your opponent after you've already started your battle phase. For card 2, I copied that part directly from Gyroid, so I'm pretty sure it's correct. [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1305136874' post='5202987'] your 2nd card is just fine, I see nothing wrong with it Card #1, however, is OPed as hell All you said was a face up monster, you didn't specify what type of monster or for that matter, on a more important matter, its stats therefore, you're suggesting you can use a 5000 atk monster to attack your opponent directly and that is WAY too easy for a OTK set up so I recommend you make sure to tune the battle damage down a bit 7/10 [/quote] You're right, I didn't specify any limitations, and that was on purpose, lol. I personally think it's fine the way it is, but if others agree with you I'll rethink it. [quote name='EddieGS25' timestamp='1305137108' post='5202998'] 2nd card is very nice, like the effect. [/quote] Thanks, I think.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 well ok fine getting monsters of that high atk out onto the field isn't easy but getting 2500 atk monsters onto the field is simple, so even if it's not a OTK, it's still too huge a blow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2011 Like I said, I'm not opposed to changing it, I'd just prefer more opinions before I go balancing something that may not require it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2011 Le BUMP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.