marcher boyz Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 [img]http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/497/419924.jpg[/img] too lazy to repost stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 So it's ultimate substitute for any card? And screws over Archetype-related stuff? Damn how I'd love this to be released IRL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 yup Don't forget that you can also modify your guys so they get archetype support. btw the letter vanishes when the card in question leaves the field, so kageki would be a 6sam again in the grave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzMasteRzx Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 And it's not overpowered? Yes, please! Good job. Score: 9.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 Wow, 90% of the stuff I posted didn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndlessOcean Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 Love it. I'd just make rude words. Legendary Six Samurai - S*** En. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 Hm. Can effectively neutralize any archetype-related effect, and has reasonable drawbacks to balance. Also is almost impossible to counter, as no cards like this exist. I like it, it's powerful. But it can only add letters, and actually subtracting or changing the existing letters also could work, as well as offering more options. You never know, you may be able to change a card into something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 [quote name='Dragon7OP' timestamp='1309462715' post='5322820'] Hm. Can effectively neutralize any archetype-related effect, and has reasonable drawbacks to balance. Also is almost impossible to counter, as no cards like this exist. I like it, it's powerful. But it can only add letters, and actually subtracting or changing the existing letters also could work, as well as offering more options. You never know, you may be able to change a card into something else. [/quote] It's easy to counter, you just run Plant Synchro/ something that isn't an archetype. too many words needed for that/ it makes a good card waaaaaaaay too versatileI just realised that this limits itself. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmon Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 Nice card 9/10 don't u mean remove from play ( banish) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 Pity Tengu runs it over. But I love how it's also called Sflnemrgnbqbqsjvb. But hey, it can't copy spaces. So it only semi-limits one-word cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 why would I make an insanely broken card even better k why wouldn't spaces count as part of a combination of letters you know what, screw this I'm adding characters and spaces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 This looks great. It's bizarre, but it seems effective as an anti-archetype measure. One problem though: it effect doesn't auto-limit itself, it auto-bans itself, since it has the name of most things on the banlist, and thus it's only usable in traditional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 ffs, thanks guy *edits first post and boosts ATK* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 I really like this. Isn't 2000 ATK a bit much though? It screws over all Archtype related things....Yay! The pic is good. OCG looks fine. Overall nice card. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='darkstar_316' timestamp='1309524417' post='5324736'] Isn't 2000 ATK a bit much though?[/quote] nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 I think the best comment I've seen so far is that it bans itself not only that it gets obliterated by prohibition. Its good on paper but I could only see it as a side deck card which means its even worse because in order for me to side it in I would have to change most cards in my deck just in case I run three copies of certain cards or two of the semi-limited. I will say it is creative if anything though.I think the best comment I've seen so far is that it bans itself not only that it gets obliterated by prohibition. Its good on paper but I could only see it as a side deck card which means its even worse because in order for me to side it in I would have to change most cards in my deck just in case I run three copies of certain cards or two of the semi-limited. I will say it is creative if anything though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Beginning446' timestamp='1309528193' post='5324901'] Its good on paper but I could only see it as a side deck card which means its even worse because in order for me to side it in I would have to change most cards in my deck just in case I run three copies of certain cards or two of the semi-limited.[/quote] ITT: creating multiple good new decks is meh and your side is a magical dimension where card limits don't apply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 I think you may have taken it the wrong way in dealing with the issues of having every possible name. Before it was interesting and potentially fun; now it seems a bit silly. Perhaps it could have the 'it's name is everything' effect everywhere but the deck - it becomes less abusable (but there's still enough potential to abuse it from the hand/grave/banished zone), but doesn't move every card in existence one level up the banlist just by it's presence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 why would I destroy half of its interactions You can smoke signal/ tengu/ spy/ darksoul/ gadget/ gearframe/ e-emergency call/ 5 gajillion other cards into a card that stops sabers/ 6sam and gets all the support cards in the game; I'm talking about Saber Hole, Divine Punishment, Royal Tribute, w/e. That's awesome. Giving up limited stuff is fair dues. [quote name='Time Psyduck' timestamp='1309529086' post='5324923'] Before it was interesting and potentially fun; now it seems a bit silly.[/quote] you silly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 But it can't be used in advanced, meaning it's only use is in the format which, from my limited understanding, is full of decks running all the stuff that's banned in advance (and thus limited there). In fact, can it be used in traditional? It also has the name of illegal cards, which can't be used in any official duel, so unless those are worked out in a different way, then it can't be used anywhere. It's a shame that all those interactions would go, but they'll all be weakened anyway because everything is at 2 at best. The ideal solution would be to change the way the "Maximum of 3" rule works and say that for deck construction it's only what's printed on the top of the card that counts, meaning this would have to be limited the same way as everything else, but would be usable in advanced. It's silly because it's 2000/2000 on a level 3, which looks at best as though it were overpowered on purpose, and at worst as though the person making it had no idea what realistic stats were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 wow I can't read thanks for posting again, I'll do what you suggested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tydog1999 Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 this card could get you kicked out of a duel for changing it to rescue cat or another banned card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted July 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 i literally just fixed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Love of Ghibli Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 No offense but now the card went from being completely interesting and not useable by technicality to just not being useful. I mean like Shakespeare said "what's in a name?" so now when its dead it can be anything, but that doesn't help in my opinion. Maybe if you did like harpie queen and made field and graveyard that would make it versatile and nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Beginning446' timestamp='1309547757' post='5325605'] No offense but now the card went from being completely interesting and not useable by technicality to just not being useful. I mean like Shakespeare said "what's in a name?" so now when its dead it can be anything, but that doesn't help in my opinion. Maybe if you did like harpie queen and made field and graveyard that would make it versatile and nice. [/quote] This. The first one was interesting and overall very usable. But you just ruined it almost. Rating lowered to 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.