Jump to content

[MTG] Wurmcoil Engine


.Nu-13

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Mystery Guest' timestamp='1311262526' post='5374277']
This creature's power and toughness are well over curve. If I would have designed a card with this effect and mana cost according to my Theory Magic, I would have made it a 4/4 that produces 2/2s.
[/quote]

Actually, P/T on their own are right on the curve here; not so sure the curve applies anymore, though. Elite Vanguard and Baneslayer have existed for a while, and Green has been running above the curve for a good while now and still hasn't gone anywhere on its own competitively.

On the actual card, very good one - and over the curve, yes, but because of the bunch of extras. I don't know how the Scars block is as a whole and what new support this benefits from, but it's really nice on its own. Mythic Rares allow for this kind of power creep to exist, which in my opinion shouldn't be this particular rarity's purpose, but that's beside the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MarbleZone' timestamp='1311272190' post='5374754']
Actually, P/T on their own are right on the curve here; not so sure the curve applies anymore, though. Elite Vanguard and Baneslayer have existed for a while, and Green has been running above the curve for a good while now and still hasn't gone anywhere on its own competitively.

On the actual card, very good one - and over the curve, yes, but because of the bunch of extras. I don't know how the Scars block is as a whole and what new support this benefits from, but it's really nice on its own. Mythic Rares allow for this kind of power creep to exist, which in my opinion shouldn't be this particular rarity's purpose, but that's beside the point.
[/quote]

MaRo has said quite a few times "an artifact is supposed to augment a deck's weakness, not increase its strengths." As such, I figure that would mean an artifact creature should be weaker than the creatures in the colors yet have some trick to them other colors don't have. An artifact creature shouldn't be so powerful such that you'd choose it over a creature in a color even if you didn't need to cover the weakness the artifact covers. Saying such, since being a 6/6 is probably made it considerable over the Titans, I'd weaken this to 4/4 and have it spit out 2/2s.

I agree that if it didn't have its abilities, I'd keep it a 6/6. However, I don't think all colors should have access to solid colorless P/T = CMC beatstick with abilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='ArchmageCarn' timestamp='1311335816' post='5377142']
I would have put it in New Phyrexia and costed it 4(Phyrexian G)(Phyrexian G).
[/quote]

Are you nuts? That would mean every deck could cast it for 4 mana and 4 life (which it will probably gain back using lifelink and/or one of its token's lifelink).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mystery Guest' timestamp='1311335339' post='5377138']
MaRo has said quite a few times "an artifact is supposed to augment a deck's weakness, not increase its strengths." As such, I figure that would mean an artifact creature should be weaker than the creatures in the colors yet have some trick to them other colors don't have. An artifact creature shouldn't be so powerful such that you'd choose it over a creature in a color even if you didn't need to cover the weakness the artifact covers. Saying such, since being a 6/6 is probably made it considerable over the Titans, I'd weaken this to 4/4 and have it spit out 2/2s.

I agree that if it didn't have its abilities, I'd keep it a 6/6. However, I don't think all colors should have access to solid colorless P/T = CMC beatstick with abilities.
[/quote]

To bee honest....I've only saw 1 Deck type using this card TBH...and that's it...the Caw Blade post Bannings...
I mean...there are better stuff than this...MUCH better stuff that this...so it is balanced as it is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...