evilhorus Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1311888009' post='5396483'] I think once per duel also applies even if the effect is negated :/ [/quote] Yeah, you're right. Happened to me once :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 [quote]I wasn't sure on the rulings on this, but I once [b]removed 5 plants[/b] from the Grave with Spore to stop this.[/quote] Then he did a lot more damage than he hoped to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 the question would be how to get it down to 400 DEF before your opponent would attack it and then play forbidden chalice? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1311923323' post='5397953'] Then he did a lot more damage than he hoped to. [/quote] I ran RftDD. Anyways we both said it was not against the rules and RftDD was quite cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 [quote name='::Archfiend::' timestamp='1311933164' post='5398072'] I ran RftDD. Anyways we both said it was not against the rules and RftDD was quite cool. [/quote] I think he means that LADD only negates 4 effects before losing it's effect, and you lost 5 plants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 29, 2011 Report Share Posted July 29, 2011 No I thought that removing ever plant in your deck (considering he doesn't run tyt or other bad cards) is a pretty steep cost to kill LADD. But I didn't consider that he can have rftdd which will be game breaking after this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.