Max Darkness Posted August 14, 2011 Report Share Posted August 14, 2011 Just a single example (since I find Unions hard to create) for this rather large contraction of the current OCG. Since all Union Monsters carry the text 'Once per turn, during your Main Phase, you can equip this card to a Machine-Type monster you control as an Equip Card, OR unequip it to Special Summon this card in face-up Attack Position. ... (A monster can only be equipped with 1 Union Monster at a time. If the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead.)', why can't that be taken as read for all '[/Union]' monsters? I have also changed the text governing any restrictions on what the Union can be equipped to. Again, thoughts on both the card and the OCG. Enjoy. [center][center][img]http://i51.tinypic.com/ff1iqo.png[/img] [b]Effect:[/b] This card is treated as a Normal Monster while in your hand. Must be equipped to a Normal Monster. The equipped monster gains the following effect: * Once per turn, you can select 1 Normal Monster in your Graveyard. Special Summon 1 Normal Monster from your Deck whose Level is less than or equal to half the selected monster's. The Special Summoned monster is destroyed at the end of this turn.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 15, 2011 Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 it's just plain synchro/xyz food, nothing too new, but it balances, so you get 9.6/10 from me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted August 15, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1313428980' post='5445027'] it's just plain synchro/xyz food, nothing too new, but it balances, so you get 9.6/10 from me [/quote] I realise it's not exactly groundbreaking (a modified "Over Destiny"); but this more a showcase of the OCG than the effect. Thanks anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.