Tymur Shayk Posted August 27, 2011 Report Share Posted August 27, 2011 They were going to be made eventually, figured I'd be the first. An additional card to the anti Synchro Meklord set. All image credit goes to 'hpdoom' all criticism is welcome [center][center][img]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/4140/459095.jpg[/img][/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]Lore: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by its own effect. When a face-up monster you control is destroyed by a card effect and sent to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon this card from your hand. Other monsters you control cannot declare an attack. Once per turn, you can select 1 Xyz Monster your opponent controls, and equip it to this card. This card gains ATK equal to those equipped monsters' combined ATK. You can send 1 monster equipped to this card to the Graveyard to destroy all face-down cards on the field. [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 27, 2011 Report Share Posted August 27, 2011 WTF that name doesn't fit in with the Meklords at all First off, Stats seem fine, and its got the clause that the emperors other than Granel have. As for the FD killing, I'm iffy about it, but I'm not sure if it would cause too much trouble. Not sure whether to knock it or try it .~. Also, Meklords existed to kill Synchros, so this really doesn't fit in... And it's uncreative, but that's just aesthetics. Overall, a good, solid card, albeit unoriginal. It just wouldn't see much play, much like Skiel, due to its relative dependence on Xys, as Skiel is to Synchros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 has a nice effect at the end, but it doesn't kill synchros fast the effect is fine the way it is, but I'd just change the name and you're done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.