{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 yes, another single. [img]http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/7782/179287.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepywood Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 How would his lose 100 effect be useful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Not OPed, balanced, interesting idea; not sure how it'd be used though... 1/1 OCG 4/4 balancing 0/2 Usability 2/3 Originality Total 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Mmmhm, might make an archetype around this. Basically in a LIGHT banish deck, you'd use this to topple those darks with 0 DEF and lulz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Not used in real. The reason is we play BLS, and need a LIGHT. Why you made card that make the fodder for BLS reduced by 1? Suggestion, > Make it 200 ATK per 1 banished LIGHT. Or maybe you want to focusing on Worms play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 The card is only good for its first effect, the second effect is pretty...useless. [quote name='Syns' timestamp='1315153244' post='5491540'] Not used in real. The reason is we play BLS, and need a LIGHT. Why you made card that make the fodder for BLS reduced by 1?[/quote] ...you're seriously horrible at this game. Why do you think that he even wanted to make this to work with BLS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 there, changed the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 ...now you made it broken. Free milling? Gawd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Lowered the ATK and DEF so it's a weakened Armageddon Knight for lights and has another effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Still broken ffs. It's not the stats that make it broken, it's the free milling effect. How hard is that to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 it's an opposite of armageddon knight, if they can make that for darks who abuse that more, why can't I for this? I'm just trying to make it on the same level as armageddon knight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 [quote name='Evolution-Emperor' timestamp='1315154746' post='5491605'] it's an opposite of armageddon knight, if they can make that for darks who abuse that more, why can't I for this? [/quote] Does Armageddon Knight also have the ability to change the battle position of monsters? Also, do DARK monsters have a monster like Wulf, Lightsworn Beast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 See what I said before that, I lowered it's ATK and DEF as an excuse to not make it an [i]exact[/i] opposite. Anyway, about the wulf part, I'll make it negate then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 It's not broke, it's just an ok card. You talked about Wulf, but no LS deck would dare run this. To be honest the only place this would see play without an archetype is in casual. Because the only LIGHTS that would be used are in Agents and Veilers. I'd honestly take out the drawback of negating the effect. And maybe up his defense. I'm digging the art and the name, the way it rolls off the tongue is nice. =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Galvantula} Posted September 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 [quote name='Legend Zero' timestamp='1315156039' post='5491655'] It's not broke, it's just an ok card. You talked about Wulf, but no LS deck would dare run this. To be honest the only place this would see play without an archetype is in casual. Because the only LIGHTS that would be used are in Agents and Veilers. I'm digging the art and the name, the way it rolls off the tongue is nice. =D [/quote] Thanks, I was getting annoyed at having to change the card so much because power play kept saying it wasn't balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☼◄Firewolf►☼ Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 Wow Good Card.:--) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 4, 2011 Report Share Posted September 4, 2011 well the atk drain isn't going to be TOO much you still thinking about making an archetype around this? 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.