Sauron Posted October 7, 2011 Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 Just found the pic, and fealt for making a card of it Tell me what ya think: [img]http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/8033/324208.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted October 7, 2011 Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 I think this should be the correc OCG: Activate by discarding 1 Level 3 or higher Beast-Type monster from your hand. Target 1 Warrior-Type monster you control: Inflict damage to your opponent equal to the targeted monster's ATK. Hope That's good Well I guess this is okay... i don't really have much to say on it... sorry but tbh... its kinda boring... but i digress... at least its not some utter crap i usually see... and I might be wrong... but it is kinda useless unless you actually build warriors with Beasts... not see how they work but eh... i give it a 7.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauron Posted October 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 I know it's a kind of boring, but think about it! It may help out for a OTK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 7, 2011 Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 a little bit situational since it requires the beast-type monster to begin with and since you mentioned OTK, you may want to put a limit to the burn you can have to this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 7, 2011 Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1318019375' post='5566405'] a little bit situational since it requires the beast-type monster to begin with and since you mentioned OTK, you may want to put a limit to the burn you can have to this [/quote] Funny how you contradict yourself in your own post, ragnarok. First you say that the card is situational, since it needs a Best-Type monster in hand for the cost, and then you say there needs to be a limit on this card? I do not know whether to laugh or cry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kato_Zenamara Posted October 7, 2011 Report Share Posted October 7, 2011 I agree. Its perfectly reasonable, since its virtually unplayable. No one really runs Warriors AND Beasts, and I don't think theres a very good way to actually do so. If you wanted to make this uber-playable, maybe make it a Warrior OR Beast-Warrior, and discard a beast OR beast-warrior. Splashable in every GB deck from here to the moon. In that case, you'd want to put a cap on the damage, like not exceeding 2000, or saying you can't reduce the opponent's life points to 0 with the effect. I like the picture though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.