Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [center][spoiler=IT'S OVER 9000!!!] [img]http://i472.photobucket.com/albums/rr84/Metagross386/Yugioh/TwilightSparkle.png[/img] Must be Tribute Summoned by tributing 3 monsters. If this card is Special Summoned, you mush tribute 1 monster you control and discard 1 card. Once per turn: You can negate the activation of a Spell Card, Trap Card or an Effect Monster’s Effect, then put 1 Element of Harmony Counter on this card. If this card battles, its attack becomes the attack of the other monster +100. Each time this card battles, put 1 Element of Harmony counter on this card. If this card has 5 Element of Harmony counters on it: Destroy all cards on the field, then each player Special Summons 1 monster from their Graveyard. Hehe, ponies And if the Type/Attribute annoys you so much, it's LIGHT and Beast-Type. [/spoiler] Rate! NAO![/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilaterus Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 The Special Summon clause is not as debilitating as the tributing of 3 monsters, methinks. I think you could get away with removing the trib 3 monsters bit and just let people summon it by tributing 2, or limit reverse hehe. Effect is basically Stardust Assault Mode without tributing itself. Makes it extremely powerful, i don't know about OP. 5 counters is too much, its not really going to get to battle 5 times. The artwork suggests it has to be 5, so add another way it adds counters? Oh lord, don't make it light, divine is much better, at least there's no divine support lol. Oh, and nice artwork. [/seriouspostontrollcard] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 *opens spoiler* *closes spoiler* ...no... *walks off* AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='bilaterus' timestamp='1318517494' post='5577352'] The Special Summon clause is not as debilitating as the tributing of 3 monsters, methinks. I think you could get away with removing the trib 3 monsters bit and just let people summon it by tributing 2, or limit reverse hehe. Effect is basically Stardust Assault Mode without tributing itself. Makes it extremely powerful, i don't know about OP. 5 counters is too much, its not really going to get to battle 5 times. The artwork suggests it has to be 5, so add another way it adds counters? Oh lord, don't make it light, divine is much better, at least there's no divine support lol. Oh, and nice artwork. [/seriouspostontrollcard] [/quote] Actually, it's not a troll card. I'll look into the stuff, maybe just weakening the negation effect somehow. [quote name='AggroDrago' timestamp='1318517641' post='5577356'] *opens spoiler* *closes spoiler* ...no... *walks off* AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [/quote] Thanks for Spamming my thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilaterus Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 Well its not a troll card, but its got your name, its divine and divine beast (sorry, meant light and beast),its artwork is a sorcerous pony, oh and its set ID is MLP. Nice touch, that. Maybe if it couldn't negate anything, just one or two of the three types of card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 I was thinking of giving it a cost or a condition for the effect. And the name is a name of a MLP character dude :I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318517853' post='5577360'] Actually, it's not a troll card. I'll look into the stuff, maybe just weakening the negation effect somehow. Thanks for Spamming my thread. [/quote] UR WELCOME! [size=1]you aggrotated pony[/size] Also, I'd like to point out that you can still special summon it with nothing on the field at the simple cost of it and a card in ur hand. U might want to just change so that you need another monster on the field and a card in your hand to SS as well. Also, for the effects this card has (this is the Wicked Avatar, but it can be SS'd and has a second effect) I'd say lower the EoH counters needed for its destruction to 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilaterus Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 A cost would work. Simple discard perhaps? Sorry, I'm not familiar with MLP. Also I didnt realise this was pop culture until just now LOL edit: @aggro: you would have to have a monster on field similar to tyrant dragon, or I think it either doesnt allow you to summon it or it tributes itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='AggroDrago' timestamp='1318518239' post='5577370'] UR WELCOME! [size=1]you aggrotated pony[/size] Also, I'd like to point out that you can still special summon it with nothing on the field at the simple cost of it and a card in ur hand. [b]Yes, special summon it only to tribute it right off again. brilliant[/b] U might want to just change so that you need another monster on the field and a card in your hand to SS as well. Also, for the effects this card has (this is the Wicked Avatar, but it can be SS'd and has a second effect) I'd say lower the EoH counters needed for its destruction to 3. [b]I'm keeping 5 only because of the show, sorry [/b] [/quote] [quote name='bilaterus' timestamp='1318518263' post='5577372'] A cost would work. Simple discard perhaps? [b]Hmm...probably like Arcana Knight Joker so I can make the summoning requirements easier?[/b] [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 A: I don't want a random fabled thing to use it B: *looks up* huh, didn't actually realize this was PC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='AggroDrago' timestamp='1318518628' post='5577383'] A: I don't want a random fabled thing to use it [/quote] Discard =/= Fabled. This is a -1 that does nothing but discard a monster that way. I'd rather run Raigeki Break in Fableds. And that is insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318518825' post='5577388'] Discard =/= Fabled. This is a -1 that does nothing but discard a monster that way. I'd rather run Raigeki Break in Fableds. And that is insane. [/quote] Raigeki Break in fableds is funny. I beat a guy once. I activated Raigeki Break and about a turn later, he looks at it in y graveyard and is like: "Why the hell do you run Rai- oh, yea, fableds... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 The image is exactly what I expected. As for the card itself, I would say it would benefit more from being a LIGHT/Beast-Type, as apposed to DIVINE/Divine-Beast, mostly because it would have more support, and would be more flexible in terms of playability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1318519245' post='5577396'] The image is exactly what I expected. As for the card itself, I would say it would benefit more from being a LIGHT/Beast-Type, as apposed to DIVINE/Divine-Beast, mostly because it would have more support, and would be more flexible in terms of playability. [/quote] Yeah but it deserves that type/attribute pairing But yeah realistically it would be LIGHT/Beast. Anything on the effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318519367' post='5577400'] Yeah but it deserves that type/attribute pairing [/quote] But thats only if it has 5 Element of Harmony counters O,o [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318519367' post='5577400']Anything on the effect?[/quote] Effect is fine as-is. Special Summoning it is like, what, a -2 every time? The effect negation part, even though it is once-per-turn, might be a bit much. then again, its also a Wicked Avatar. .....Ok, so [i]MAYBE[/i] leaving it as DIVINE/Divine-Beast might be better, since you could get away with having effects like that, while also giving it no outside support. (It would be balanced then, I guess?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 Omg just figured out a cost for the negation effect. Redone the card, rate please (look at the text below the card, not the card itself) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 Limit Reversable Shien-esque monster with a win-condition... I can actually see this card seeing a somewhat decent amount of play in dedicated decks, it has all the effects it needs, and in the right decks it'd be somewhat easy to keep reborning it if necessary. But, the drawbacks do appear to balance it. However, the fact that it gets 1/5 of its win condition every time it negates something seems a bit too good... But I guess no one's stupid enough to let you pull that off, and only becomes an issue when it reaches 4, where you've basically locked your opponent down completely. Good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 Win condition? Never thought of it that way since the opponent gets a monster as well, and could easily pull off a win with the monster they pulled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318521759' post='5577444'] Win condition? Never thought of it that way since the opponent gets a monster as well, and could easily pull off a win with the monster they pulled. [/quote] I feel pretty stupid for missing the opponent getting one too, part. Either way, it's well made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Tristan T. Taylor' timestamp='1318521955' post='5577452'] I feel pretty stupid for missing the opponent getting one too, part. Either way, it's well made. [/quote] Why thank you. What would you have thought if it was a costless negation like it was before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318530225' post='5577626'] Why thank you. What would you have thought if it was a costless negation like it was before? [/quote] Wait... it is a costless negation isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Tristan T. Taylor' timestamp='1318533726' post='5577760'] Wait... it is a costless negation isn't it? [/quote] Before I didn't have the counter part (I'm considering it a cost okay? <.<) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1318536881' post='5577892'] Before I didn't have the counter part (I'm considering it a cost okay? <.<) [/quote] If anything it makes it more usable, because it's not held back so much by its inability to get the 5 counters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 14, 2011 Technically legal bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Moon Posted October 14, 2011 Report Share Posted October 14, 2011 [font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][size=3]O.O Dude, this is f***ing epic! :3 The image is awesome and the effect is great. ^^[/size][/font] [font=arial,helvetica,sans-serif][size=3]Congrats on your 9000+ posts, dude. [/size][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.