T3RA PROWL3R Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 [img]http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/9261/204630.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmepie Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 Seems like a well-balanced and well-made card, would work well with cards that require you to discard cards from your hand like Tribute to the Doomed, Card Destruction and even ritual cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted October 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 Just so you know, there IS a difference between discarding cards, and sending cards. I'll put in the ruling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 Erm, no. A discard is ALWAYS a send, but a send is not always a discard. Like a Rectangle = Square, but Square =/= Rectangle. If it says send, it won't activate discard effects. If it says "when sent" it can be discarded. Anyways, card is meh. Sending costs aren't really around anymore (Hence why Light Serpent is meh. in addition to no Sync), and Fabled Catsith does this way better do to archetype Support... And Catsith sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 [quote name='T3RA PROWL3R' timestamp='1319040104' post='5588137'] If "Hand Destruction" was used to send this card, its effect WOULD activate. [/quote] Except you made this miss timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted October 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 I guess. I was thinking in terms of the DW monsters only got their effects if they were discarded not from a cost, Hand Destruction not working with them, etc. And this was pretty much just "One of those cards" that nobody will ever remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glogatha Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 its a good idea and everything, but, its just got two many cards over it, id much rather use penguin soldier over this, but its handy against deck burn.... 8/10 great idea and simple, but wouldn't see much use... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 eye for an eye effect you lose a card, your opponent loses one, nothing too new, though it seems balanced enough 8.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted October 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 That's what I was going for. I'm not gonna start getting into huge things right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 19, 2011 Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 It's freaking UNDERpowred ._. Change When to If. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted October 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1319065471' post='5588732'] It's freaking UNDERpowred ._. Change When to If. [/quote] xD I will, if I decide to do anything else with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.