kevin7653 Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 what do guys think of my new card [img]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/3299/218546s.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoRWBY65 Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 seems balanced for that low level with that high of an attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FindingTheEverlight Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 It's interesting to say the least, but why use a card like that, when you can summon something like Alexandrite Dragon, sure it's a vanilla, it's not like its bringing back your opponents monster after it destroys it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 So pretty much, you attack a face-down Sangan, Sangan is destroyed and its effect activates, during end phase, opponent gets Sangan back. Meh, it's only good with Skill Drain, but it doesn't make the card any better since you're not going to always have Skill Drain ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 shure but you get a 2000 ATK monster for nothing and you can countiluly do life damage to the opponent ecepecialy if they have a weak monster and then again its may Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='kevin7653' timestamp='1322335318' post='5667288'] shure but you get a 2000 ATK monster for nothing and you can countiluly do life damage to the opponent ecepecialy if they have a weak monster and then again its may [/quote] Your opponent will use that effect to his / her advantage and get the monster back during the End Phase. It should be freaking obvious. And you know what? They choose the battle position, so if you destroy an monster in Attack Position with this, they can just SS that monster back during the End Phase, in face-up Defense Position. So yeah, your opponent regaining a monster is too much of an drawback since it allows your opponent to make even more plays that might make you lose, especially if they revive something like Sangan or Dandylion etc. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 true but still a good effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 It's Gene-Warped War Wolf with a drawback. Let's look at the the comparisons. Both are EARTH. Both are Beast-Warrior Both have 2000 ATK This has more DEF, but not enough to warrant more use since you could just pull Giant Soldier of Stone instead, and that's a bad card right there. This gives your opponent's card back to them. Warwolf just obliterates it. Need I say more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='kevin7653' timestamp='1322336603' post='5667351'] true but still a good effect [/quote] Are you really this daft at reading posts and understanding what's written in said posts? Seriously, how hard is it to undertsand that I was saying that the effect is [i]NOT[/i] good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Yay another lv 4 with semi high ATK with a drawback that makes it unplayable. Miror beating me to the Gene Warped Werewolf thingy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 how bout it deals half the difference between its atk and opponents def if the card is in defence position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Partangle the Candle Jangler Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 This card is unplayable I can't think of a reason to run it. You really need to reconsider the effect or just make it a level 5 vanilla with more attack... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 will somone please check the ocg of this updated effect When this card destroys a monster on your opponents side of field your opponent may special summon that card in his end phase.When this card destroys an opponents monster this card gains 500 ATK.When this card attacks a defense position monster deal damage to your by half of the difference between the ATK of this card and DEF of this cards target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jazz Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='kevin7653' timestamp='1322347377' post='5667845'] will somone please check the ocg of this updated effect When this card destroys a monster on your opponents side of field your opponent may special summon that card in his end phase.When this card destroys an opponents monster this card gains 500 ATK.When this card attacks a defense position monster deal damage to your by half of the difference between the ATK of this card and DEF of this cards target. [/quote]Now it's just too strong. I'll fix OCG then rate. When this card destroys a[b]n opponent's[/b] monster[b]:[/b] [s]on your opponents side of field[/s] [b]Y[/b]our opponent may [b]S[/b]pecial [b]S[/b]ummon that card [s]in[/s] [b]during [/b]his [b]next[/b] [b]E[/b]nd [b]P[/b]hase [s].When this card destroys an opponents monster[/s] [b]and[/b] this card gains 500 ATK. [s]When this card attacks a[/s] [b]During battle between this card and a [/b][b]D[/b]efense [b]P[/b]osition monster [b]whose DEF is lower than this card's ATK:[/b] [s]deal damage to your by[/s] [b]I[/b][b]nflict [/b]half [s]of[/s] the difference [s]between the ATK of this card and DEF of this cards target.[/s] [b]as Battle Damage to your opponent.[/b] I'm pretty sure that's correct, but I've never seen a card with half piercing damage before. Anyways, the card made a big jump from being too weak to too strong. The half piercing doesn't even matter since it's only half, but the gaining ATK effect is what makes it OP. If it can stay on the field for just one turn chances are by the next it'll have 2500 ATK, then it will be able to crush most level 7 or even 8s. Then the piercing is there for an added maybe 6 or 7 hundred damage. Maybe take away some effects or add another hindering one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FindingTheEverlight Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 The new effect you posted is both cliche and a bit OP'd, maybe if you lower the ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 this doesn't make any sense why would you WANT your opponent to get the monster back onto the field right away in the first place? Besides, you said it yourself your opponent has a choice in the matter, it's not like you're choosing for him or anything like that I mean yes you do gain 500 atk in the process and yes its permanent, but even then, it just seems wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 the guy gets it back because it was for a coontest and one of the requirments is that the monster has come back to the plus it keeps it from bieng to op Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jazz Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='kevin7653' timestamp='1322409002' post='5669432'] the guy gets it back because it was for a coontest and one of the requirments is that the monster has come back to the plus it keeps it from bieng to op [/quote]You should have stated it was for a contest then, to avoid a lot of harmful comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted November 30, 2011 Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 Contest or not, I still stand by my previous post, and would have probably not rated this high in said contest either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 i got 6th out like 15? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted November 30, 2011 Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 Okay? I don't care. I'm rating it as I see it, regardless of how that contest ended. You could have gotten 1st and I still would be saying the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin7653 Posted November 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2011 true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.