Cobax Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 [img]http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/3838/456365.jpg[/img] If you saw the card "Red Eyes Shadow Dragon" well this is its powerful form This Card cannot be Normal Summon or set. This card cannot be special summon except by Banish 1 "Red Eyes Shadow Dragon" from your side of the field. If this card was selected as a target of Spell, Trap or Effect of a Monster(s), you can send 1 Dragon type monster from your Deck, Hand, or Field to the graveyard to negate it. Increase the ATK of this card by 200 for each dragon type monster in all graveyards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 The first one was terrible, though... It's even worse than the other one, because it requires the really bad other one to even be summoned. And it only gets a SLIGHT perk when compared. The ATK gain is the same as the last one, but both graveyards, and chances of that actually being enough to be beneficial is SLIM. Targeting cards aren't really used in the meta that much, sans Inzecters and Scrap Drag, so its secondary effect is pretty meh. Then there's the fact you gave it 1000 more DEF, and the same ATK... Defense doesn't matter, and the ATK gain is the same as the last one, so why would I run this incredibly situational card? And on top of all else, it is really, really unoriginal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobax Posted December 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 its not powerful then blue eyes shinning dragon but this card is powerful then red eyes darkness dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 [quote name='Cobax' timestamp='1322701665' post='5677385'] its not powerful then blue eyes shinning dragon but this card is powerful then red eyes darkness dragon [/quote] ... But Red Eyes Darkness Dragon is more powerful than Blue Eyes Shining Dragon ._. This card is so damn hard to summon, it should have an auto-win effect for all the dedication it takes >.> "Powerful" isn't effects alone- It's ease of summon and what it does TBH, Tour Guide is more powerful than Darkness or Shining, even though it's a level 3 with 1000 ATK. Why? It maintains advantage, and gets you lots of combos, whereas these types of cards.... Are just REALLY bad bosses, that double as unoriginal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 [quote name='Cobax' timestamp='1322701665' post='5677385'] its not powerful then blue eyes shinning dragon but this card is powerful then red eyes darkness dragon [/quote] Yfw Blue Eyes Shining is weak. Shadow Dragon was bad because Darkness Dragon is bad. Darkness requires a undersupported/bad card to be played, Shadow requires a card that requires a bad card, this requires a card that requires a card that requires a bad card. Do you see the problem? The negation effect doesn't matter since not many people are going to willingly target this card, and the gain just says "Hurr durr I have more than 3000 ATK points" while your opponent just says "Hurr durr Dark Hole" Evolutions of cards that require the previous card better have good effects or they won't be used. This doesn't have a good effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 its kinda like darkpaladin with the atk gain right? In a good dragon.dek the negation would be cake... I haven't seen the last card... link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YuichiHokuto Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 little fix: This Card cannot be Normal Summon or set. This card cannot be special summon except by Banishing 1 "Red Eyes Shadow Dragon" from your side of the field. If this card was selected as a target of Spell, Trap or Effect of a Monster's effect, you can send 1 Dragon-type monster from your Field, hand or Deck to the graveyard to negate its activation and destroy it. This card gains 200 ATK for each Dragon-type monster in either player's Graveyard. Not bad card, maybe little OP'ed but I like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1322702009' post='5677402'] Yfw Blue Eyes Shining is weak. Shadow Dragon was bad because Darkness Dragon is bad. Darkness requires a undersupported/bad card to be played, Shadow requires a card that requires a bad card, this requires a card that requires a card that requires a bad card. Do you see the problem? The negation effect doesn't matter since not many people are going to willingly target this card, and the gain just says "Hurr durr I have more than 3000 ATK points" while your opponent just says "Hurr durr Dark Hole" Evolutions of cards that require the previous card better have good effects or they won't be used. This doesn't have a good effect. [/quote] Mirror, since you mentioned Blue Eyes Shining Dragon, does ANYONE actually use it? I thought the card sucked horribly the second it came out all those years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1322800598' post='5680021'] Mirror, since you mentioned Blue Eyes Shining Dragon, does ANYONE actually use it? I thought the card sucked horribly the second it came out all those years ago [/quote]Yeah... why tribute a 4500 monster for one with 3k?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 well Shining Dragon DOES get atk gain boost, though when I saw it it fell way short of what I was expecting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
·Toot Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I still wouldn't take a chance... ya might run into warning or something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 same here, risks simply too high and you lose too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.