Valkyrus Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 Because boobies always attract the attention. anyways, to the archetype: I made this quite on the rush, I wasn't thinking much, but I think they're turning out fine. Maybe not the most useful, but I'm thinking more about originality. here they are: [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/taurus.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/pisces.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/dinozod-virgo.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/dinozod-libra.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/dinozod-gemini.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/dinozod.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/aries.jpg[/img] [img]http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb278/mario1092/aquar.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 so many pics look alike for Tarurus, the summoning effect might get broken since you can use them for synchro/xyz food Pisces is better since you can't use the draw power indefinitely for Virgo, for the summoning effect you may want to consider that you can't summon another Virgo Libra is better, like a skill drain effect to a small extent, but it works out fine for the archetype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YuichiHokuto Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 I like this very much, I like idea and effects, but it wants more support that allows them to attack. 9.5/10 And you're not using new dumb grammar with " [b]:[/b] " I like this either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qdrack Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 These are some cards I'd need to see in action to really understand, still (besides pisces) They look balanced. The pics are dull, but the idea is good. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 I can see it now! Catapult turtle....ACTIVATE. You have terrific OCG, worth reading. The card name text should be more clear, and the pics are the same boring shade. Graphically, it's not your best work. Otherwise, i'd like to see more. I sense XYZ coming <@_@> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted December 7, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 wow, one of my lamest threads and it gets more responses than much much better threads of mine... The boobies are doing their job it seems.. Sadly I don't intend to finish this, I just found the pictures and thought it would be fun to make an archetype out of them.. Maybe I'll add a Xyz or two later, but for now I'm done with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 O_o....Skill drain has new buddies... I love the "Can't attack" concept with the level 1 EARTH Dinosaur structure. Makes for some unique plays O_o and their high ATK or DEF makes them last on the field. They have a nice set of field presence effects and with the level 1, EARTH, and Dinosaur-Type support cards out there, this just may be a tier 2 - 1.5 deck O_o. Wolf in Sheep's Clothing is gonna be an interesting tech with this archtype and Catapult Turtle just may push this deck into a decent OTK. Overall, nice concept, nice cards, and you (get my very first rating?) a 9.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacklion65 Posted March 29, 2013 Report Share Posted March 29, 2013 Nice cards! But I think that this archtype needs a xyz like one that needs 4 level 1 monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Murphy ☆ Posted March 29, 2013 Report Share Posted March 29, 2013 Nice cards! But I think that this archtype needs a xyz like one that needs 4 level 1 monsters Why did you bring this year old topic back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacklion65 Posted March 29, 2013 Report Share Posted March 29, 2013 Oh sorry did not look at the date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.