Astolfo Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 Using one of the templates in tutorials somewhere and Renji's custom SPACE-attribute, I welcome you to N.E.M.E.S.I.S.! I'm sure he's broken, so please give some help on how to balance. TY! Without further ado:[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/2qu26gk.jpg[/IMG] CC please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sketchy Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 WOW extrimly broken XD First of all lets adapt the text XD: You can discard 2 Machine-Type monsters to Special Summon this card from your hand. Once per turn you can discard 1 card in your hand that has "machine" in the Card Description to Special Summon 1 level 5 or lower Machine-Type monster from your Graveyard. Ok thats the text the the summoning condition its like machina fortress but you cant discard it self so its an ok condition. The fact its that its really simple to summon and its 2º eff its to broken beacuse every turn you can discard even magic or trap card to special summon a machine of level 5 or less so gadgets and cyber dragon will be prostituted (LOL) XD its ingenous to create your own atribute hope to see more cards with it by the way what program or page did you use to make that card???? XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 it's nothing really hard to summon to the field the special summoning effect, it'll get broken for too easy machine type summoning especially since the discarding ANY machine card will trigger it so even just once per turn is too much, I'd made it more specific of a card to discard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AkatsukiPride! Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 Just saying, shouldn't "Lore" be "Card Description?". And agreeing with everyone else, this card is extremely broken. Extremely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astolfo Posted December 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 I changed effect, to fit the "Numeral-like" things in the picture. Is it still too broken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 17, 2011 Report Share Posted December 17, 2011 To be honest I'd never summon it. Instead I'll try to send 3 copies to the Graveyard in the first turn as fast as possible, summon a 2700 beatstick, and declare gee gee. That said, that's pretty damn easy given how milling and discarding cards are all over the place. Besides, Banishing is the new toolbox, due to Leviair and Tour Guide. I say give the last effect the "(You can only activate this effect of "N.E.M.E.S.I.S." once per duel)" clause or something. BTW, I dun see why this had to have its own attribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astolfo Posted December 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 Updated! @Darkplant: I felt like making it special. :DDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 [quote name='Mrgoodbar122' timestamp='1324152163' post='5713049'] Just saying, shouldn't "Lore" be "Card Description?". And agreeing with everyone else, this card is extremely broken. Extremely. [/quote] We say "Lore" cause 1. It's the same thing 2. It's shorter Also, [b][i]effect of "N.E.M.E.S.I.S." [/i][/b]<- Don't see any reason for the card name to be included. We all know it's the effect of the same card. And I also agree with ragnorak: The summoning cost is puny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astolfo Posted December 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 [quote name='Ongaku Matsuri' timestamp='1324171653' post='5714091'] We say "Lore" cause 1. It's the same thing 2. It's shorter Also, [b][i]effect of "N.E.M.E.S.I.S." [/i][/b]<- Don't see any reason for the card name to be included. We all know it's the effect of the same card. And I also agree with ragnorak: The summoning cost is puny. [b]he was talking about old version, where discard one to ss a lv 5 or lower monster in grave. I changed eff.[/b] [/quote] If you think it's easy to get out, then how should I balance self summoning eff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 [quote name='∞ΩAoki ᴁturna ★ ShooterΩ∞' timestamp='1324171766' post='5714097'] If you think it's easy to get out, then how should I balance self summoning eff? [/quote] How about instead of discarding monsters from your hand, add an extra "Machine-type" tribute, cause that way you'd have put effort into getting it out rather than simply getting rid of 2 weak cards that you don't need. That's just plain cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astolfo Posted December 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 so discard 2 and tribute 1? Sure. Lemme do that. :DDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 [quote name='Ongaku Matsuri' timestamp='1324172039' post='5714110'] How about instead of discarding monsters from your hand, add an extra "Machine-type" tribute, cause that way you'd have put effort into getting it out rather than simply getting rid of 2 weak cards that you don't need. That's just plain cheap. [/quote] WTF are you smoking Given Machina Fortress exists, this card is worthless as a beatstick. And you're saying it should become even more worthless. You should stay with the current summoning conditions. On a separate note, I don't really care if you keep it with this eff, but if it gets released, it'll probably break the meta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 [quote name='Darkplant - FEAR' timestamp='1324172607' post='5714142'] WTF are you smoking Given Machina Fortress exists, this card is worthless as a beatstick. And you're saying it should become even more worthless. You should stay with the current summoning conditions. On a separate note, I don't really care if you keep it with this eff, but if it gets released, it'll probably break the meta. [/quote] It still has 2800 attack, but now that you mention it: Banishing 5 monsters to attack twice is a little exaggerated. Perhaps 3 or maybe even just tributing? Also, it's been a while since I judged cards, so I may not be as logical as most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted December 18, 2011 Report Share Posted December 18, 2011 i like how you use Once per turn you can discard 1 card in your hand that has "machine" in its lore maybe start a entire archtype / deck / set with this theme if you dont i will lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.