Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 [align=center]^_^ Time for another Dose of Technosis ^_^ Original Image Artist = nongenre Original Image Artist = viraana Notes - They are made obviously, to work together.- I was once told that Special Summoning to the field is broken as it promotes field advantage or something, so i gave them a neg effect as well as a positive ^_^- They do indeed, combine with the other Dj's etc.etc.- They were made quickly so i expect possible mistakes lol Coming Soonish... Currently Listening to;Covenant - Dead Stars (Live Mix) ^_^[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Nice! Reminds me of Swamp Battleguard and Lava Battleguard (I think that's the name. Pretty good stats too! 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanx Jspa ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Really like them Dj, pictures are very, very nice. ^_^You never fail to impress me Dj.9.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Awesome cards! Though I don't like Neuro's pikky.... :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanx Cyber S, and thanx Kizzi ^_^ awww, i thought Neuro looked cute lol so i had to use him ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Nice DJ8.5/10 to me ^_^Meh.....1 more post.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Nice DJ8.5/10 to me ^_^Meh.....1 more post.... Thanx Yankee ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 In your notes you didn't say flabergast or something and I think its slightly underpowered, try boosting the stats up by 200 or something 9.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 In your notes you didn't say flabergast or something and I think its slightly underpowered' date=' try boosting the stats up by 200 or something 9.1/10[/quote'] I thought their stats could do with a boost, but they get enough boosts from cards in the new set, but i will surely consider it ^_^ Thank you ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 lol, i can only see half of the cards lol, can you post the effect and the ATK and DEF for me please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SebastiaanZ Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Pics are good as always. The effects are balanced and very good. Reminds me of Swamp and Lava Battleguard as well. Let`s see, 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanx Sepman ^_^ and CD, try refreshing the page ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slash Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think they're great DJ 9.5/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I'm sure something will come up to give them a boost-but for now they're underpowered, I think. Still, great pictures, and a lovely job on the names. However... Never say "points." Just say "Increase this card's ATK by 300." Comprende?Nice job, and Syn looks awesome!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanx Slash ^_^ and thanx cyber, i always say points just on the safe side ^_^ hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 :3 But you shouldn't...it's not correct... hehe ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 :3 But you shouldn't...it's not correct... hehe ^^ Actually your wrong lol it IS correct lol As ppl well know' date=' i obey mainly Old OCG lores, old or new, both are still correct, just ones newer then the other. Examples; [img']http://i26.tinypic.com/2mrduut.jpg[/img] etc.etc. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUL Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Great! The pics are awesome! 9.5 /10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyKev Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 *sigh*Again...againmore great cards byDj-Osiris...It hurst me to do thisbut I have to 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 ^^ DJ, DJ...poor dear. :3 Those cards are extremely old...allow me to...err....reacquaint you. ...A bit more recent, eh? *Dons spectacles* Oh my, I spot no "points" in there... ^^No worries...everyone makes mistakes sometimes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thanx Kev mod and Kid ^_^ And Cyber Commander, are you BLIND?????? I CLEARLY, said i use OLD OCG LORES!!! yes, it says it CLEARLY on my previous post. Old or New, BOTH ARE CORRECT! I thought you would at least know that... I know ppl make mistakes, your blindness was one of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Sweet child, let's not have fight. Then we'll have an argument-which I will win. ;) And for your obviously lacking information, old OCG is not correct-it is the up-to-date ones that should be used by any...er...competent cardmaker. Such is the example for "by battle" and "as a result of battle." Only one is correct, whilst (I love that word! :3) both have been used in the past. That's all I have to say on the matter-this is getting ludicrous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 The past can still be correct you fool These cards will never be officially released, thus why do we care if it contains Old or New OCG? Are you that obsessed with a card game that you actually care about it?? lol Thats sad lol If it is not correct, why was it originally made that way? The only reason they have changed is to allow a quicker format and understanding to the game. Its still ok to use old OCG, well it is if your not stupidly obsessed with a childrens card game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.