RAEGING D0GKING Posted December 30, 2011 Report Share Posted December 30, 2011 x3 Guldfaxe x3 Tanngnjostr (Black goat) x2 Tanngrisnir (White goat) x3 Hamster x2 Ryko x3 Tour Gide x1 Sangan x1 Gorz x1 Veiler x1 Gale x1 BLS Envoy of the Beggining x2 Duality x2 MST x1 Dark Hole x1 Monster Reborn x1 Heavy Storm x1 Book of Moon x1 Mind Control x1 Avarice x3 Gleipnir x2 Warning x1 Torrential x1 Mirror x1 Judgment x1 Dustshoot x1 Thor x1 AoJ Decisive Armor x1 Trishula x1 Stardust x1 Scrap Dragon x1 Black Rose x1 Scrap Archfiend x1 Ancient Sacred Wyvern x1 Brionac x1 Catastor x1 Roach x1 Lavalval Chain x1 39 Utopia x1 Leviathan Dragon [b]x1 17 Leviair the byakk Dragon[/b] x2 Nobleman of Crossout x2 AoJ Core Destroyer x2 Chain Disappearance x3 Rai-Oh x1 Consecrated Light x1 Jujitsu Master x2 Bottomless x2 Debunk obv was the worst deck in the top 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 Looks terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1325295701' post='5739843'] Looks terrible. [/quote] Works wonders. I get thor almost ever game, Decisive armor WINS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 Netdecker :/ Spamming Thor doesn't a great deck make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='sgrug4' timestamp='1325297055' post='5739911'] Works wonders. I get thor almost ever game, Decisive armor WINS. [/quote] f ing netdecker. Side 1 MST and neg a MF for 2 D Prison, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325300975' post='5740064'] f ing netdecker. Side 1 MST and neg a MF for 2 D Prison, I guess. [/quote][quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325300975' post='5740064'] f ing netdecker. Side 1 MST and neg a MF for 2 D Prison, I guess. [/quote] How else should i test an available deck? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='sgrug4' timestamp='1325301115' post='5740077'] How else should i test an available deck? Please. [/quote] What does that even mean? "available deck" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325301337' post='5740095'] What does that even mean? "available deck" [/quote] One tht's rdy for testing? Dont butcher me about it. I'm just testing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='sgrug4' timestamp='1325301566' post='5740109'] One tht's rdy for testing? Dont butcher me about it. I'm just testing it [/quote] There's a difference between testing and netdecking. Testing is you actually damn give him a fix after seeing it in action (usually by playing it yourself). Netdecking is taking a deck without notice and using it, pretty much acting as if it's yours. You use "I" like it's your deck. So, any constructive fixes on the deck? Otherwise, remove yourself from the Prince Doggy's thread. Pretty sure he can test well himself anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325301691' post='5740125'] There's a difference between testing and netdecking. Testing is you actually damn give him a fix after seeing it in action (usually by playing it yourself). Netdecking is taking a deck without notice and using it, pretty much acting as if it's yours. You use "I" like it's your deck. So, any constructive fixes on the deck? Otherwise, remove yourself from the Prince Doggy's thread. Pretty sure he can test well himself anyway. [/quote] Chill out, guy. W/e i say now, you're going to be on my back...rdy to spit some fire. If he can test it himself, he wuld fix it himself, but he posted it here available so others can provide feedback Consider 1-2 safe zones Possibly side fiendish chains for rai-oh -1 MST for another duality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='sgrug4' timestamp='1325302164' post='5740158'] Chill out, guy. W/e i say now, you're going to be on my back...rdy to spit some fire. If he can test it himself, he wuld fix it himself, but he posted it here available so others can provide feedback Consider 1-2 safe zones Possibly side fiendish chains for rai-oh -1 MST for another duality. [/quote] You just word your words extremely strangely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325302215' post='5740165'] You just word your words extremely strangely. [/quote] Maybe it's just you having a hard time understanding? Why do you get so offensive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='sgrug4' timestamp='1325302326' post='5740174'] Maybe it's just you having a hard time understanding? Why do you get so offensive? [/quote] Because you come in a thread without any sort of warning, and, for some reason, has already managed to 'test' the deck without saying anything except "Thor's good, Decisive Armor's good. Good." At least have the courtesy to come in and say that you're using the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1325302638' post='5740189'] Because you come in a thread without any sort of warning, and, for some reason, has already managed to 'test' the deck without saying anything except "Thor's good, Decisive Armor's good. Good." At least have the courtesy to come in and say that you're using the deck. [/quote] My bad. Next time i'll knock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted December 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 i post an old deck i got out i go in oh lol loads of pointless posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325306554' post='5740333'] i post an old deck i got out i go in oh lol loads of pointless posts [/quote] "i didnt start the flame war" - CH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 Did that argument really happen? > Dog posts decklist > Welche says something inconstructive about how the deck appears on paper. > Other guy says he tested it and it works great, directly contradicting Welche's statement. > Welche accuses tester of netdecking. > Rai fervently argues about the morality of playing with a Deck posted in the Your Deck section, presumably the issue being he didn't specifically notify the TC he was going to do this. I'm all for those lovely formalities, but I daresay this scenario will never happen. > Dog posts Deck > Tester: Hey, can I playtest this? > Dog: NO! Don't you dare touch my Deck! > Tester: ... Therefore, saying "I'm going to test this" is just a formality with little positive merit, and I really don't think the reaction(s) were warranted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 Welche posts a hilarious ironic comment about the deck being bad when he has dueled against it more than most YCM members because Dog King loves testing. Welche then posts a true comment saying that the other member took a decklist and used it. The followup comment refers to a deck me and Dog King watched in action that was horrible and yet it coud spam Thor and Loki like mad. 3 Duality over a Gale. Duality can get you any of the cards you like to set while Gale is just a tech that is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1325308351' post='5740393'] Did that argument really happen? > Dog posts decklist > Welche says something inconstructive about how the deck appears on paper. > Other guy says he tested it and it works great, directly contradicting Welche's statement. > Welche accuses tester of netdecking. > Rai fervently argues about the morality of playing with a Deck posted in the Your Deck section, presumably the issue being he didn't specifically notify the TC he was going to do this. I'm all for those lovely formalities, but I daresay this scenario will never happen. > Dog posts Deck > Tester: Hey, can I playtest this? > Dog: NO! Don't you dare touch my Deck! > Tester: ... Therefore, saying "I'm going to test this" is just a formality with little positive merit, and I really don't think the reaction(s) were warranted. [/quote] It was basically netdecking /ok And very unsubtle at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 there is nothing wrong with netdecking and it is indeed a great tool to help people get better at yugioh OT: Seems pretty good, but I don't really play Nordics. What are some good plays with this deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 this deck loses to plants when they forget to side edit: sorry *fiends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted December 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='Kyosuke Kiryu' timestamp='1325325321' post='5740650'] this deck loses to plants when they forget to side edit: sorry *fiends [/quote] Meh if I had a better build I could of had a chance to win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325334518' post='5740688'] Meh if I had a better build I could of had a chance to win [/quote] If I sided cards I could've prevented that ps i like your build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgrug4 Posted December 31, 2011 Report Share Posted December 31, 2011 [quote name='Nightmare Zarkus' timestamp='1325320879' post='5740599'] there is nothing wrong with netdecking and it is indeed a great tool to help people get better at yugioh OT: Seems pretty good, but I don't really play Nordics. What are some good plays with this deck? [/quote] Lvl 4 tokens, lvl 2 tuners, it makes insta lvl 10 synchros like thor and decisive armor /shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.