.Nu-13 Posted January 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325517159' post='5744305'] except I'm a Prince now [/quote] For that post you're a God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325517159' post='5744305'] except I'm a Prince now [/quote] No, usted es un Señor OT: It's a tech, obviously. What else would it be? =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1325517219' post='5744306'] No, it isn't. Plant Synchro is actually good, and tops. Chaos Dragons wouldn't even make top 32. The point of justification is that they're running Dragons, where there are far superior builds. Why would you tech it? Teching it implies you're already running 3 Chaos Sorc and BLS, why would you also want this on top of that? [/quote] Yes it could if someone played them right found new techs etc. Chain Burn has topped, Empty Jar has topped with Book of Moon at 1. okay there a superior builds but do they work exactly like this one? no, maybe its people preference etc. Have you read the fact is mills a dragon from your deck? Thats the only reason you COULD tech it, Im not saying this is a good card Im just saying that people could use Chaos Dragons if they wanted to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted January 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 Tristan, you make it like Chaos Dragons are the least effective and most inconstinent deck in existence. Guess what? If built right, they're very solid and effective. But well, if your deckbuilding sucks, no wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='Yūki Terumi' timestamp='1325517649' post='5744314'] Tristan, you make it like Chaos Dragons are the least effective and most inconstinent deck in existence. Guess what? If built right, they're very solid and effective. But well, if your deckbuilding sucks, no wonder. [/quote] I'm making the point that they're inferior to other Dragon builds. i.e. Disaster Dragons. There is no justification that they're better. Next you're trying to make out they're a good Chaos deck, which they aren't. Even Twilight is more consistent. Funny how you of all people insult my deckbuilding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1325517781' post='5744316'] I'm making the point that they're inferior to other Dragon builds. i.e. Disaster Dragons. There is no justification that they're better. Next you're trying to make out they're a good Chaos deck, which they aren't. Even Twilight is more consistent. Funny how you of all people insult my deckbuilding. [/quote] DUUUUUUUUUDE thats like saying before Plant Synchro was invented that no one should of even tried to use Plant Synchro because it was bad back then. If we cant try new deck ideas how will we find NEW good decks? Maybe they are actually good but no one found a good way to use them? Also your pretty much saying we should only use tier 1 decks and we should netdeck them from ycs winning decks so all of our decks would be the same! OH YAY THIS WILL BE THE MOST INTERESTING CARD GAME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 Sh*t's getting annoying. The arguing is stupid and has no point. This is half the reason I locked Klav's thread. All you guys are doing is bringing up a point, then insulting everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='Twilight Sparkle' timestamp='1325518456' post='5744328'] Sh*t's getting annoying. The arguing is stupid and has no point. This is half the reason I locked Klav's thread. All you guys are doing is bringing up a point, then insulting everyone else. [/quote] Im not arguing, Im just stating that Tristan is telling us to not try to new deck ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325518713' post='5744330'] Im not arguing, Im just stating that Tristan is telling us to not try to new deck ideas. [/quote] I don't give a damn what you're trying to say, you're arguing and that's all there is to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 Darkflare [i]is[/i] too slow to be truly useful, as I've said before. I've mained both Chaos ever since Pulsar got announced, and I've mained Disaster for 5 years. I've had plenty of time to do extensive testing, and I can say for certain that Chaos Dragons just aren't as good as Disaster. That's why I gave up on Chaos and switched back to Disaster last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='el Prince Doggy Señor' timestamp='1325517557' post='5744312'] Yes it could if someone played them right found new techs etc. Chain Burn has topped, Empty Jar has topped with Book of Moon at 1. okay there a superior builds but do they work exactly like this one? no, maybe its people preference etc. Have you read the fact is mills a dragon from your deck? Thats the only reason you COULD tech it, Im not saying this is a good card Im just saying that people could use Chaos Dragons if they wanted to. [/quote] Actually, that Empty Jar that topped was pure lucksack Guys, This happens every time. When a SD comes out, everyone at first thinks s***s gonna get broken, then a short while before and after release, everyone says "oh hurrdurr nvm dis dek iz bad huurrr" Then a couple YCS's later we find that deck topping. Prime example is Dark Worlds, who at first everyone though was just overhyped. But then someone found the right build that tops. Now stop saying Chaos Dragons are bad. Just give it time to find the right decklist, and stop bieng ignorant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 I never said Chaos Dragons were bad. All I'm saying is that right now, Disaster is just more consistent. If someone can find a build that abuses Pulsar/Darkflare/etc, then I'd love to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted January 2, 2012 Report Share Posted January 2, 2012 [quote name='Rainbow Dash' timestamp='1325527757' post='5744531'] I never said Chaos Dragons were bad. All I'm saying is that right now, Disaster is just more consistent. If someone can find a build that abuses Pulsar/Darkflare/etc, then I'd love to see it. [/quote] I was referring more or less to Tristan But Pulsar really isn't good. It was broken, but since its not anymore, its just not as useful. But atm I do tech is @1, still testing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.