cok_pis_bakar Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 [img]http://img862.imageshack.us/img862/2067/145474.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirun Wolf Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 I like Evil Kuriboh haha. But that spell card is ridiculous. No cost, and can deal an immense amount of damage if played right. I'm just not sure about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cok_pis_bakar Posted January 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 [quote name='Kirun Wolf' timestamp='1326153883' post='5756862'] I like Evil Kuriboh haha. But that spell card is ridiculous. No cost, and can deal an immense amount of damage if played right. I'm just not sure about it. [/quote] Yeah I agree with you but this use as a limited card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 Losing land isn't really anything too new reminds me of Ring of Destruction + Ring of Defense, you just don't lose the monster, and that's it I guess it's good set up for OTK depending on the burn you inflict, so nothing wrong there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cok_pis_bakar Posted January 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1326162838' post='5757153'] Losing land isn't really anything too new reminds me of Ring of Destruction + Ring of Defense, you just don't lose the monster, and that's it I guess it's good set up for OTK depending on the burn you inflict, so nothing wrong there [/quote] Thanks for your comment and I never seen these cards (Ring of Destruction + Ring of Defense) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 they're old cards basically ring of destruction you destroy a monster on the field, both you and your opponent loses LP equal to the atk of that monster ring of def negates the effect damage done to you by trap effects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1326162838' post='5757153'] I guess it's good set up for OTK depending on the burn you inflict, so nothing wrong there [/quote] You're saying there's nothing wrong with a one sided Ring of Destruction? The hell are you talking about man? Ring of Destruction was banned, because it was a badly designed card that allowed anyone to cheaply get rid of a monster on the field. Apart from that, this is the same as Ring of Destruction. This card is a badly designed card that makes the interaction grow even smaller than it already is when it comes to dealing with burn decks. Ring of Destruction was banned for a reason. This is pretty much the same as RoD, without the cost and with a one-sided burn effect. The hell were you thinking when you made this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merciless Overlord Knic Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 evil kuriboh is great, just that losing land really has no price for a potentially game deciding effect. If you used that on a monster with 3000 ATK, you've just inflicted 3000 damage to your opponent at no cost to you. I say that if the monster is level 5 to level 7, the monster is banished for 2 turns. lvl 8 & up is banished for 3 turns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 [quote name='Merciless Overlord Knic' timestamp='1326237318' post='5758138'] I say that if the monster is level 5 to level 7, the monster is banished for 2 turns. lvl 8 & up is banished for 3 turns. [/quote] Cept the problem here is that the card allows you to target any face-up monster on the field, your opponents as well. Adding an effect like that wouldn't change anything. A cost to banish a monster you control to inflict its ATK to your opponent will not change much, as well, mainly because if you're using a card like this, it will not matter if the monster is banished as long as you've inflicted x amount of damage to your opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cok_pis_bakar Posted January 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2012 I edited my card ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.