evilhorus Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 It certainly is more than you've contributed.Not to mention that's not even the purpose of the OP, but whatever.idc if I contribute, thats the mods job to care lol What's the purpose of the OP then, if not to contribute to the community? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Evil Tristan Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 TCG Rule 3: Generate worthwile content that contributes to a discussion Just thought I'd point this out. We've had plenty of topics like this before, and they do not generate any discussion. Merely an idiot trying to defend his point against the multitude of arguments or insults against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 You're telling me that, yet do you know each and every card which is forbidden/limited and semi-limited without looking it up? Not off-hand, but if I looked at a card or was told its name, I usualy know its current placement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Relius Clover Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/266212-the-developous-format/page__hl__developous__fromsearch__1 As mentioned, this has been come up with already The result? Not much to say as most everyone said it, just letting you know how it ended with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 not sure why evilfusion or pika or miror or lz hasn't locked it for basically breaking rule 3 of TCG. And that we're discussing a hypothetical, which is pretty much not allowed in TCG anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 It wouldn't work. Thread needs the Groose's Theme treatment: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 not sure why evilfusion or pika or miror or lz hasn't locked it for basically breaking rule 3 of TCG. And that we're discussing a hypothetical, which is pretty much not allowed in TCG anyway. Its funny cause I reported the thread before anybody even replied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted January 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 wow, people are still discussing this? I thought I already said a couple of times, in a very conclusive way, that it wasn't a good idea after all...so why do people get the impression I need more convincing? And by the way, that TCG Rule 3 or whatever does not apply to 99.9 % of the threads in TCG since it's usually a picture of the card with added "discuss" under it. Such a biiiiiig contribution there... What a bunch of idiots some people are.. Anyways, lock this or something. Had a meaningful discussion with some of the few intelligent members on here, don't need any idiots to have this as their spam playground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 wow, people are still discussing this? I thought I already said a couple of times, in a very conclusive way, that it wasn't a good idea after all...so why do people get the impression I need more convincing? And by the way, that TCG Rule 3 or whatever does not apply to 99.9 % of the threads in TCG since it's usually a picture of the card with added "discuss" under it. Such a biiiiiig contribution there... What a bunch of idiots some people are.. Anyways, lock this or something. Had a meaningful discussion with some of the few intelligent members on here, don't need any idiots to have this as their spam playground. The opening post in TCG is only ever used as a catalyst for discussion. Usually, most members are able to have a decent discussion without someone spoonfeeding them some starting info. You're in absolutely no position to be calling others idiots. Such an inflated ego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrus Posted January 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 The opening post in TCG is only ever used as a catalyst for discussion. Usually, most members are able to have a decent discussion without someone spoonfeeding them some starting info. You're in absolutely no position to be calling others idiots. Such an inflated ego. My thread could generate a great deal of discussion if it wasn't for some people.Also, of course if you're implying comments such as "nope.avi" and "/thread" are intelligent, I really have nothing much to say about that. but whatever, I have my answer, some mod lock this already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 My thread could generate a great deal of discussion if it wasn't for some people.Also, of course if you're implying comments such as "nope.avi" and "/thread" are intelligent, I really have nothing much to say about that. but whatever, I have my answer, some mod lock this already. 1. Why on earth did a mod NOT lock this upon Canadian reporting it before replies and 2 mods posting in the thread?2. Umm...we have actually been through this exact thread before by a member called Developous. And we completely summed up the thread via: Banned cards are banned because they are bad design, and overpowered even by themselves. Not a single card would be balanced just by banning its 'combos'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 not sure why evilfusion or pika or miror or lz hasn't locked it for basically breaking rule 3 of TCG. And that we're discussing a hypothetical, which is pretty much not allowed in TCG anyway. In comes FD to save the day. Yea, this would be beyond impractical since who is to say what combos would be unfair and etc, etc. Lock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hatcher Posted January 10, 2012 Report Share Posted January 10, 2012 not sure why evilfusion or pika or miror or lz hasn't locked it for basically breaking rule 3 of TCG. And that we're discussing a hypothetical, which is pretty much not allowed in TCG anyway.*complains about thread**doesn't report it* On-topic: Half the cards in the banlist are just bannable because they're just plain bad card design. Monster Reborn, Pot of Greed, Brain Control, Change of Heart, Raigeki, Harpie's Feather Duster, etc etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.