Red Eyes Neo Dragon

[Obliterador]

[sub][img]http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/5382/366944.jpg[/img][/sub]

[sub]eff - "Red Eyes Black Dragon" more 1 tuner monster[/sub]
[sub]When this card detroy an opponent monster, banish it. This card gain 300 atk for each of your opponent banished cards. Once per turn, discard 1 card to banish 1 monster in your opponent greveyard.[/sub]

[Kitsumonogatari]

1 Tuner monster + `Red Eyes Black Dragon`
When this card Destroys as a Result of a Battle a monster your Opponent Control ,Banish it instead of sending it to the Graveyard , This card Gain x300 ATK For Each Monster in your Opponent Banish Zone. Once per turn you can Discard 1 card from your Hand, if you do, You can Banish 1 card in your Opponent Graveyard's.

Not sure if everything is right ^^

[Yogg-Saron]

"Red-Eyes Neo-Dragon" or "Red-Eyes Neo Dragon" would fit the name more.

"Red-Eyes Black Dragon" + 1 Tuner Monster
Banish any monster this card destroys in battle. This card gains 300 ATK for each of your opponent's banished cards. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card and banish 1 Monster in your opponent's Graveyard.

I think that is borderline correct. Maybe someone super special awesome will fix that

Besides the OCG, the card seems good and would give REBD SOME playability. But honestly, I don't see how the card supports the main function of REBD decks, to get out high ATK Dragons. This in no way affiliates itself with other REBD support or similar cards.

[Kyng's Old Account]

I'll end all queries:

[color=#5A5A5A][font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif][size=3]"Banish any monster this card destroys in battle. This card gains 300 ATK for each of your opponent's banished cards. Once per turn: you can discard 1 card; banish 1 Monster in your opponent's Graveyard."[/size][/font][/color]

This card doesn't somewhat provides a use for Chaos Dragons, however it serves the complete opposite purpose; why you would run Red-Eyes with Chaos Dragons, except REDMD of course, is beyond me. This card, however, is overpowered, because of the following reasons:
1 - This card banishes monsters is destroys by battle (which is fine) as well as discarding to banish (which tips the balance).
2 - Banishing two cards in a row is unjust, the latter effect (Discard to banish) should not allow this monster to battle in the same turn.

I can see the text in the bottom right corner which somewhat spoils the image, but that aside this doesn't offer really an support for any Red-Eyes Deck I can imagine that actually, well, works.

[NeoTwice]

Kyng's right, it is OPed in that it can banish and attack in the same turn.

I don't mind the card overall, but it doesn't feel like a Red-Eyes monster to me, because it's playing off your opponents banished cards, whereas previously Red-Eyes monsters play off your own graveyard.I think this would work better if it gained ATK for your own banished cards, especially with Red-Eyes Wyvern in the mix.

Also, I don't think the signature ni the bottom is an issue. It's no worse than this:

[img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111010003433/yugioh/images/7/73/BlueEyesWhiteDragonVG-TF04-JP.png[/img]

[ragnarok1945]

ok this is reasonably good, a hell of a lot better compared to like Red Eyes Darkness Dragon and all that

atk gain is fine, seems a bit too easy to banish your opponent's cards though....

[Kyng's Old Account]

[quote name='NeoTwice' timestamp='1330385399' post='5844917']
Also, I don't think the signature ni the bottom is an issue. It's no worse than this:

[img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111010003433/yugioh/images/7/73/BlueEyesWhiteDragonVG-TF04-JP.png[/img]
[/quote]
This is proving my point; this is not good artwork unlike the originals. For a 5th Gen Artwork I was let down, big time.

¬_¬

[NeoTwice]

Well to each their own, but my point was that a small signature in the bottom corner really isn't anything against a card image.