Cyber Altair Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Invader Of Darkness now this card is a good card, a good attack of 2900 and a defence of 2500 makes it a powerful card and also it's effect makes you immune from quick-play spell cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Alright, let's take a crack at this card. Level 8 is great for a card to be. DARK is better. Fiend is one of the better types. 2900/2500 is very solid. Now that the stats are out of the way, lets make a list of commonly used Quick-Play Spells. Mystical Space TyphoonShrinkEnemy ControllerScapegoat (not so much anymore)Book of Moon (will see a lot more play) That is quite a list of cards. This card isn't the best choice for every deck, but if you absolutely need another DARK Level 8, you could do worse. 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 yea aprt from those there isnt much point id rather have DMoC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Very good card. I own it and it's one of my favourite (although I never use it xD ) Since most people play with Spell Cards these days, there will always be atleast 1 Quick-Play Spell card. The only problem is it's Level. 8/10 It's basicly a Jinzo that negates Quick-play spell cards from your opponent. Very good card, but hard to summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 its boring in my book. kinda like a normal 2900 ATK mosnter because all it does is negate quick play spells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loren Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 i yous'd to have him awsome card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 i always throw invader in when i make a fiend and/or dark deck. though, with the new darks in phantom darkness, i'm not sure if i'll need another high-level monster for my dark deck.... in other words, i have mixed feelings about invader >_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 It's not really good. Chances are it's not going to be in defense, so DEF is null/void. It's ATK isn't bad. It's effect isn't too drastic. Mainly for MST... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God GAK Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Hm...i have to thank you, that is another card that i must add to my dark deck . *special summon it with doom shaman* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 I've always had a soft spot for this guy. The fact is there are only so many quick plays out there that see common use. But still, the fact that he negates them, and only your opponent's on top of that, makes him infinitely superior to a 2900 no effect. Someone said that his effect is worthless, they are wrong. He doesn't belong in the deck, but he is a very solid side deck option in a good many decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 Level 8 makes him Trade-In able.Dark is good. Fiend makes him Doom Shaman-able. ... His effect is pretty... meh, though, but not a complete waste. You could do worse. 4.8/10 There are better options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 As said before, can eb used with trade-in. Possible good in one of the new PTDN dark decks, with reasoning, Dashers, Escape from Dark Dimension, ect. OK, but there are better choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.