Been a member for almost three years, and now I make my first XYZ monster...

[WhoAreYou?]

[IMG]http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee377/David_Thornhill/image.jpg[/IMG]

Well, what do you think?

[Zazubat]

Seems a bit OP, since you could easily get 3 level 4 monsters more, I dunno if you can special summon the monster that you detached, but still that's 2 level 4 monsters, not that card to get back.

[WhoAreYou?]

[quote name='Zaziuma' timestamp='1335628182' post='5927565']
but still that's 2 level 4 monsters, not that card to get back.
[/quote]
2? What?

[SunKistRebelution]

I think it's pretty balanced since the SS'd Monsters get destroyed. I have no idea what Zazuma was trying to say.

[L0SS]

I concur. This works nicely. 3 Level 4's and a fair effect. I would perhaps lower the the attack a tad, as 2500 is a large amount for this effect; but it's up to you.

[Sander]

[quote name='Tqne' timestamp='1335630674' post='5927606']
I concur. This works nicely. 3 Level 4's and a fair effect. I would perhaps lower the the attack a tad, as 2500 is a large amount for this effect; but it's up to you.
[/quote]

Anything under would make the card be easy to be destroyed by battle. There aren't any monsters (not talking about Xyz) used in the meta that are 2500+ what could take this down. Xyz are a different matter since monsters with 2500+ exist etc. etc. What I'm trying to say is that if your opponent summons something with 2500+ without clearing your field first (ie Inzektors), this will provide you with some protection.

[L0SS]

Fair point. I suppose that 2500+ non Xyz/Synchro monsters are few and far between; this just feels slightly excessive to me.
But weighing it up, three level fours is a decent amount. I suppose it's pretty balanced. Would be a useful card for some Spellcaster support.

[WhoAreYou?]

Thanks, guys. Sooo... Wanna rate this?

[WhoAreYou?]

Bump

[Sander]

[quote name='DJVD' timestamp='1335657744' post='5927902']
Thanks, guys. Sooo... Wanna rate this?
[/quote]

0/10


[size=1][color=#ffffff]fyi, ratings are worthless[/color].[/size]

[WhoAreYou?]

[quote name='Zanda Panda' timestamp='1335686077' post='5928175']
0/10[size=1][color=#FFFFFF]fyi, ratings are worthless[/color].[/size]
[/quote]
lolk
BUMP