Jump to content

My Dearest


Blake

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Cherry_Blossom' timestamp='1337352892' post='5941853']
Im not a fan of reckless greed, but thats oppinion. I would say drop one for a dealings, or does dealings not work. Also, I think honest works rather well. the build seems fine though.
[/quote]
Reckless gives the deck some needed speed and ability to gain advantage even faster. Each Reckless is a -1 on its own, but the more you activate between your draw phases increases it to a +0 or +1. In this deck, you grab combo pieces that make things like Librarian, Formula, and Ragin to regain any advantage you've lost.

Dealings isn't good here. Just because it discards, doesn't mean it's for Fableds. There is also the fact that it is a -1 if I don't have Cerburrel/Kushano/Ganashia that lets my opponent set up as well, more often than not. Fableds tend to only care for discarding among themselves, with only a few techs here and there that might discard.

Honest is terrible in Fableds because you're using the monsters as materials, not as fighters, and Honest can easily clog the hand, and I'm already running 2 hand-cloggy cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1337366652' post='5941962']
Do 3 Grimro really clog?
[/quote]
Quite a bit, sadly. It's an amazing searcher, but when you draw a Grimro late game it's the worst feeling, especially when you're topdecking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1337481210' post='5943008']
Bump >=
[/quote]Well you ARE the foremost expert on Fabled here.

Noticing this only now, but do you have less monsters in here than you normally do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not been a week yet, so... Bump.

Still don't care for BLS here, but not much else to put in and it's won a few games (It's hilarious with Wyvern)

Also added Allure because I have a sizable amount of DARK and it makes good use of them if I can't.

[quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1337499674' post='5943124']
Noticing this only now, but do you have less monsters in here than you normally do?
[/quote]
Missed this
>>
<<
^^

Relatively less, yes. Usually have closer to 25, but this format a lot of monsters for the deck died .~.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...