Wyvernstorm Posted June 27, 2012 Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 This is the first card i made after i joined this forum. Take a look at my card and please rate and comment my card. Thanks I'll say this is a limited card if it is used in TCG. [img]http://i.imgur.com/iI6I9.jpg[/img] Description: You can activate this card's effect by tributing 1 monsters on your side of the field. If this card battles a monster whose level is higher than this card's, destroy the monster by this card's effect without applying damage calculation. Destroy this card at the end of the turn this card's effect activated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mew 2.0 Posted June 27, 2012 Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 "You can only activate this card's effect if there is one or more monsters whose level... " "This card can [s]can[/s] destroy the targeted monster(s)." "This card must be removed from play at the end of the turn..." Lots of grammar issues and if you ask me, over powered. Maybe make it so that only one monster can be destroyed, it sounds as if every monster level 5 or over get killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy Posted June 27, 2012 Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 This card would not be overpowered, it isn't at all. What it is is a Warrior Toolbox styled Catastor and a nice alternative. It'd only really see tech play iirc. That being said, the creativity on this card is... odd. I don't know why I think of Kotodama when I see this card and that's just messing with my head... ugh. It's a great first card though, major respect for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvernstorm Posted June 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2012 [quote name='The_Riddler' timestamp='1340774682' post='5962965'] "You can only activate this card's effect if there is one or more monsters whose level... " "This card can [s]can[/s] destroy the targeted monster(s)." "This card must be removed from play at the end of the turn..." Lots of grammar issues and if you ask me, over powered. Maybe make it so that only one monster can be destroyed, it sounds as if every monster level 5 or over get killed. [/quote] You're right at some points, i've edited this card and its effect, please take a look at it But i don't think it's OP'ed, this card's effect can only be activated when it's battling [b]a[/b] Lvl 5 or higher monster, and no damage calculation applied. This card can be very useful when battling a powerful opponent with their powerful monster cards, including god cards. [quote name='Icy' timestamp='1340776156' post='5962971'] This card would not be overpowered, it isn't at all. What it is is a Warrior Toolbox styled Catastor and a nice alternative. It'd only really see tech play iirc. That being said, the creativity on this card is... odd. I don't know why I think of Kotodama when I see this card and that's just messing with my head... ugh. It's a great first card though, major respect for that. [/quote] thks dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueQuartz Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 This card should be banished instead of destroyed, don't you think??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanPark24 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='TrueQuartz' timestamp='1341709932' post='5970036'] This card should be banished instead of destroyed, don't you think??? [/quote] Why? It doesn't even pose that much of a threat. It's Level-based and requires a tribute to even use its effect. Also, it only has 600 ATK. Besides, it doesn't even work against Xyz's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueQuartz Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='JordanPark24' timestamp='1341711327' post='5970061'] Why? It doesn't even pose that much of a threat. It's Level-based and requires a tribute to even use its effect. Also, it only has 600 ATK. Besides, it doesn't even work against Xyz's. [/quote] It is a HUGE threat. You could have a bunch of monsters that special summon monsters or simple tokens to wipe out the opponent. And there is WAY more Level monsters then Xyzs. Plus, you could just spam cards that revive cards to spam his effect. It's best to be banished afterwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanPark24 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='TrueQuartz' timestamp='1341712419' post='5970085'] It is a HUGE threat. You could have a bunch of monsters that special summon monsters or simple tokens to wipe out the opponent. And there is WAY more Level monsters then Xyzs. Plus, you could just spam cards that revive cards to spam his effect. It's best to be banished afterwards. [/quote] I'm going to go ahead and assume you know nothing of the current format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvernstorm Posted July 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Nah, Banish is just too much, you know D.D. warrior lady? it doesn't require Tribute to activate its deadly effect (though the damage calculation still apply) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanPark24 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='Wyvernstorm' timestamp='1341712895' post='5970094'] Nah, Banish is just too much, you know D.D. warrior lady? it doesn't require Tribute to activate its deadly effect (though the damage calculation still apply) [/quote] He thinks it's a viable threat, though. In that case, we might as well banish Catastor when we're done with it too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvernstorm Posted July 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 [quote name='JordanPark24' timestamp='1341713001' post='5970096'] He thinks it's a viable threat, though. In that case, we might as well banish Catastor when we're done with it too! [/quote] lol Yeah exactly haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.