Dryad Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Artist: m2mazzaraLink to Art: Ruling:When "Brimstone Behemoth" would normally deal Battle Damage to your opponent, even if it was originally only 100 points of damage to your opponent's Life Points or so, it is instead changed to the amount of damage the opponent would receive if this card had attacked directly. I intended on using both meanings of the word Brimstone for this card. Aside from that, I was always curious of: what would be the effect for a card that was a quasi-direct attacker? So I came up with this effect, but then I realized, of course their would be the fact that their would be OCG issues no doubt when I post this card so I gave it a special ruling. Enjoy :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Mmm, wouldn't it be just as easy to say "When "Brimstone Behemoth" deals Battle Damage to your opponent, it is treated as the amount the opponent would receive if this card had attacked directly." Or am I missing something? Either way, I think it's a very nice card, good concept, perhaps a bit overpowered, however. Just barely, I'd say. 8/10 EDIT: Oh, my, my, my. I took the "Ruling" to be the effect, and judged it from that. Now that I've read the card's context, it's blatantly broken. It was a good idea, but I'm sorry, it's quite overpowered. Still, good job. 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
God of Cadillacs Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Cool Card 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 reminds me of "Rod of Minds Eye"..... interesting card... 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 i agree with icyit dosewow thoughamaizing card^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 ooh... +rep for you... i like it ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dryad Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Thanks for the comments guys :) I will name this severely strong and deadly beast... Fluffy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary9672001 Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Nice card 9/10!Can't wait to see your other cards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 ice job, I see the effort, you did very well ^_^I look forward to seeing more from you ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faded Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 That cards way too broken sorry! Your monster has;3000 ATKNo summoning condition or restrictionsCant be weakenedCant be TrappedIts damage inflicting ability is in a class of its ownNegates Monster Effects Now compare to other cards;[Jinzo] Negates Traps [Cant be trapped] Only has 2400 ATK [1 effect] and got limited for a long time. [Wildheart] Negates Traps [Cant be trapped] Only has 1500 ATK [1 effect] [Ancient Gear Golem] Negates Traps and Spells [Cant be trapped] Has the same ATK. Cant be Special Summoned. Does piercing damage. [Dark Ruler Ha Des] Negates Monster Effects. Has 2450 ATK [1 effect] [Dark Lucius LV8] Negates Monster Effects but only if Special Summoned by Dark Lucius LV6. Only has 2800. Removes monsters from play. The other 2 effects [Cant be weakened, and always doing 3000 damage] are in a class of their own. Theres nothing to compare them to. I can put it in another way and say it like this: "Increase the ATK of this monster by 3000 when attacking a face-up Attack Position monster on your opponent's side of the field, until the end of the damage step..." If I put it in that sense which is similar, then I can compare it to [injection Fairy Lily] who can boost her ATK but at a high cost, and its ATK is low. There are others but I think you get the point. Not having a summoning condition really tops of the cheapness/brokenness of your monster. Id say back to the drawing board. You have nice ideas but its too extreme. If it was 1400-1700 ATK without negating traps then Id rethink about my opinion of your monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 very nice, but opponent's needs the ' before the s, rating 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slash Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 I really like it, good job 9/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima™ Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Its an O.K. card, 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Very nice card and effort, i love the picture, i can really a see an improvement in you white rose, well done. ^_^8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.