cyberdude Posted March 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 I never thought of that one thanks and dark ill take your suggestions into consideration Edit: just a quick expliantion on the name pocket monarchy is a name me and my friends like to use to describe when were useing macro monarchs to confuse our oppoints becouse we hate the standard names Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 PWWB is bad for this deck. GK Servant/Macro is overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 GK Servant/Macro is overrated. This is true for the same reason that SORL is overrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberdude Posted March 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 good thing im not going to run ether then huh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 PWWB is bad for this deck. GK Servant/Macro is overrated. Which is why I said to run no more than 1 for this deck, if any. I would, however, like an explanation as to why PWWB is bad in this deck. I realize that its usefulness is diminishing, but I don't see why this deck is any worse off with it than the next Monarch deck. When you're a couple turns ahead of your opponent, its generally much easier to get out the tribute monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 That would be valid' date=' if Thestalos was really that hard to type. Also, he didn't say Thesty, even I sometimes say that, he said Testy. And of course we can read it, but with more difficulty than is necessary. In responses/Suggestions to a deck, I find abbreviations acceptable, as long as they are understandable. But when you're the one putting the deck up for review, you should be minimizing the effort for those who take the time to give you suggestions. It isn't a huge deal, I'm just a grammar freak. And sentences are much easier to read than 1337 speak. Don't do anything different on the internet then you would when writing a letter. (And the reason I didn't PM you was because it wasn't your case in particular that bothered me. I feel that the majority of forum users as a whole can learn from this. If you would have preferred privacy, I apologize, and will be sure to keep that in mind in the future)[/quote'] He has a mental disability. LET IT BE. Plus, hes part of the reason I get free stuff online, so yeah, respect this man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Sheo, it was already dropped... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Chances are, if it's not good enough to run in multiples, it's not good enough to run in singles. Macro decks reply on the Macro aspect to win games. PWWB is better for faster decks, or at least explosive ones. Macro is neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 OK, I'll accept that. (though I do disagree with your comment about multiples and singles) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 There has to be a reason why the card shouldn't be run in doubles, chances are, the same reasoning could defer the card from being run in singles. There are exceptions, but PWWB/GK Servant aren't one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.