AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 [img]http://i.imgur.com/4Z5nt.jpg[/img] I've been peering into WC, and there's a friggin' ton of Exodia threads there lately. Why, life, why? As for this card, I'm wondering if not too many Decks have become reliant of Spell Cards, so that this card wouldn't be exactly broken. Plus, with an average of what, 12, Spell Cards ran in a Deck, this might not become some sort of new Crush Card Virus. The OCG might be a bit off, but I'm no real OCG nut and I don't care that much. To be honest, I may be exaggerating on how much of a cost discarding a card could be, and I'm sure I spent longer looking for words to use for alliterations than I did on the card. I'm so reckless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 Okay, first off, you get to see your opponent's hand. Alone, that isn't THAT bad, as we can see with Mind Haxorz. But then you add effects, like Trap Dustshoot or Mind Crush and you start having a disaster. First off, banishing pretty much ANY Spell cards will give you a huge advantage. This is broken in the same vein as Trap Dustshoot honestly. You see your opponent's hand, banish/return their resources, then proceed to counter them the rest of the game since you know their hand. Sure, one can recover from Trap Dustshoot sometimes, but if your opponent draws it Turn 1, you're playing with a 5 card hand to their 6. This is the same idea, except even lower then 5 sometimes. It's just... Bad horrendous design. There is no redeeming this card. It's broken and it'll either be broken or terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW Posted November 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 Sense enough, but I can be stubborn and try to fix it anyway. Now it's really redundant for some reason I could fix (but am not seeing or subconsciously wanting it to be cool with Greed), and doesn't give you any insight bonuses. Plus, now the Spells go to the Deck, as if that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saynt Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 Rather tedious that cards have to be drawn, then shuffled back, and drawn again. If the purpose is to deplete the hand, there must be a better way to do so (although requiring you to discard 1 card from the hand nullifies the advantage). "Sorcery-Siphoning" in the name would suggest to me that a spell is to be discarded or banished, rather than returned to the deck (Sorcery-Suppression Sanction?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.