Sora1499 Posted November 25, 2012 Report Share Posted November 25, 2012 Has it ever occurred to anyone else that there are no outstanding rank 4s in the game? Rank 2 has gachi, rank 3 has zenmaines, rank 5 has tiras and adreus, rank 6 has ptolemys and bounzer, rank 7 has big eye, rank 8 has thunder end dragon, and rank 9 has Heart-Earth... But rank 4 only has "decent" cards. I'm here to change that. [URL=http://yugico.com/user/31887-sora1299/card/30847-Etc_/143356-Flora_of_the_Manipulus][IMG]http://yugico.com/customcard/143356.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SynchroTuner Posted November 26, 2012 Report Share Posted November 26, 2012 You do realize that this card is....... I don't know. Why would I run this? It only banishes my own card. Okay, maybe in some situations it would be ok to banish a card of own.... Maybe to counter mirror/torrential/other mass destructions...But otherwise why? Or is it to be used to negate our own card and instead banish an opponent's card? Wasting a Spell/Trap? Either way, it's effect can only be used twice(once if the opponent banished this card...). Personally, I really would not call this card outstanding. And, you don't have to mention the last part in the brackets. Since the Spell/trap's effect becomes "...your opponent controls...", it is clear. Its atk also seems high for just 2 materials and a rank 4. Maybe reduce it by 100 or 200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted November 26, 2012 Report Share Posted November 26, 2012 No really good Rank 4 Xyz Monster? What about Maestroke? I always run either two or three in a Deck (unless the Deck has no Level 4)! Maestroke is both a wall, an effect negater and card removal! I don't really see how this card can be better than Maestroke. Why would I want my opponent to banish my card. I see how it [i]possibly[/i] can be used but really? I would not use this. The Fabled have this one card that makes your opponent's first Normal Spell card each turn discard one card from their opponent's hand instead (and it's of their opponent's choice so you get to choose what Fabled monster you discard), so why don't you have it like "detach 1 Xyz Material and discard 1 card; Negate the activation of the Spell/Trap card and destroy it". Or if you really want to banish your own cards: "detach 1 Xyz Material and banish 1 card you control; Negate the activation of a Spell/Trap card and destroy it" so your opponent doesn't get to choose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted November 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2012 Good point... I'll give it a few tweaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted November 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2012 Changed the card's effect completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2012 No feedback on the new effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SynchroTuner Posted November 29, 2012 Report Share Posted November 29, 2012 Okay, for the new effect. It is good, but not excellent. Yet another spell/trap negator. I dont know if it's just me, but IMO spell/trap negators have become clichéd. It detaches 1 [i]plus[/i] banishes a monster to negate. There are easier ways to negate spells and traps than banishing monsters. The second effect, which was probably to bring back the monster banished in the first effect, is definitely more useful in a chaos/d.d./banishing deck. Oh, and one thing about the picture, which i forgot to say in the first review, is that it is very nice. It looks good, but gives an appearance of a Psychic more than a Plant. But it is like a flower so, not complaining. I liked the 2nd effect, but not the 1st one that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.